HEY....EVERYONE...Don't you get it? Global Warming ISN'T ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT!!!!!! Hello???????? ANYONE HOME?
It is about politics and economies. Global Warming proponents are ALL SOCIALIST AND COMMUNIST. You will be hard pressed to find a conservative amongst them, if you can at all.
They want merely to hamper and hamstring the free market and capitalism...THAT IS THE GOAL...
Geesh, is there no one else out there that sees this??????
2007-02-27 02:32:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Yeah, how do they get global warming on mars if Americans aren't there to muck it all up?
Oh wait, we did land those two little rover thingys that must be the problem, Quarter of a billion miles away and we are puting V-8's on the planet. Oh and BTW did you know that a majority of the record Highs in Arkansas and the United States were set in 1898, 5 years before Mr. Ford set up his assembly line and addicted everyone to the " Horseless Carriage"? And that the same scientist that are promoting Global Warming now were concerned in the 1970's of the comming Ice Age? How can you make predictions about a chaotic system like the Earth's Environment if you are only going off a centuries worth of data? They read less than 1% of the story and have already figured out who the murderer is, yet they don't have a body and no one is missing.
2007-02-27 02:38:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Democestes 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Are you sure? Everyone else seems to be completely convinced that global warming is somehow George Bush's fault. Maybe he's been secretly sending fossil fuels there.
Cappi: I wonder if you will still have this attitude when the free market / capitalists decide that your backyard is the cheapest place to put in a new landfill site, and there's nothing to hold them back.
2007-02-27 02:30:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dharma Nature 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
it truly is a properly-beloved fantasy it truly is doing the rounds and is losely in reaction to NASA comments yet has been grossly distorted and exaggerated by some international warming skeptics. it might want to be a sturdy concept to study the unique NASA comments so that you'll positioned issues into context. in short - there is data to point that the south polar ice cap is melting, there is also data to point the north polar ice cap is increasing. for this reason inspite of warming is happening on Mars is barely affecting parts of it. The probable clarification for any warming on Mars are the international duststorms that sweep by the planet for days on end, such an experience on earth (were it conceivable) might want to also bring about significant transformations in our climate. further, Mars is quite, very distinct to our own planet therefore making any comparisons very unreliable. It has no breathable ecosystem, isn't customarily vegetated, isn't predominantly water, thoughts extreme temperature transformations, is so chilly that the ice caps are not frozen water yet frozen gas (carbon dioxide) and that is no longer inhabited by people. it might want to be an quite conveneint answer to say that the solar is to blame for warming on Mars and on earth, if that were the case then the different planets and moons in our photo voltaic gadget might want to also be warming - they are no longer. there is 172 of all of them advised and on one hundred sixty 5 of them no warming has been talked about. we've quite precise gadgets for measuring transformations contained in the output from the solar and all of us know that the difrerence between the optimal and lowest outputs (insolation maxima and insolation minima) is quite small - adequate to reason international warming or cooling over thousands and tens of millions of years yet nowhere close to adequate to deliver forth the transformations we've witnessed contained in the perfect few many years. the truthfully distinction between optimal and minimum output is a version of somewhat below a thousandth (a version of one million.3 Watts in preserving with sq. metre in preserving with year hostile to a advise of 1366 W/m2/year). back, please refer to the unique NASA comments, the skeptics attempt to fool you by concealing data and distorting others.
2016-10-17 09:17:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by lubin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats exacly what everyone wants. If the C02 level rises on Mars. Chance are ice deep under mars will melt and water will apear on Mars and after that many other things will happen.
2007-02-27 02:25:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sk8terMov 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Gosh, I guess this man-made global warming is spreading to other planets! I wonder how Al Gore is going to explain that.
2007-02-27 02:31:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by kaiticometrue 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
Someone asked for sources:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mars_ice-age_031208.html
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mgs/newsroom/20050920a.html
http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17977
http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/CO2_Science_rel/
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36049
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/mgs-092005-imagesc.html
http://astrobiology.arc.nasa.gov/news/expandnews.cfm?id=962
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=edae9952-3c3e-47ba-913f-7359a5c7f723&k=0
"Pursuant to a request from 14 United States senators, the NASA Office of Inspector General (OIG) is conducting investigative and audit activities regarding alleged 'repeated instances of scientists ... having publication of their research blocked, solely upon their views and conclusions regarding the reality and impacts of global warming.'"
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=23218
2007-02-27 02:37:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Michael E 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Cool maybe mars will come back to life.
2007-02-27 02:25:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes. Sunspots are a natural phenomenon. Greenhouse gases from cars, power plants, forest/crop burning, etc. here on earth are not.
2007-02-27 02:25:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by KC Slim 5
·
1⤊
4⤋
Nope, wasn't aware of that
2007-02-27 02:29:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by yesette 4
·
0⤊
1⤋