English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Would it simply be to intrusive?

2007-02-27 02:03:39 · 4 answers · asked by Patric F 1 in News & Events Media & Journalism

4 answers

This would make it a lot more interesting wouldn't it? Newspapers want to let people know that someone has died, not to exploit their death. It's out of respect.

OBITUARY
76 year old so-and-so passed away last Friday. Her head was lopped off by a samurai sword and she was then gang-raped by ten midgets.

There, does that satisfy you?

2007-02-27 02:10:30 · answer #1 · answered by gibsonfanchuck 2 · 0 0

Most times families write obituaries as a way to honor their family member's life. They occasionally will make reference to the cause but usually it's about who they were and what they did, not how they died.

Newspapers don't usually write an obit - it's usually submitted by the family.

2007-02-27 02:11:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

not sure of criminal or no longer, yet i might wager that maximum persons request the information no longer be listed as public. i comprehend whilst my spouse's father died, we in basic terms listed it as "an prolonged ailment". comparable with my grandmother. We felt there grow to be no ought to put in the paper the reason, human beings who enjoyed them knew the ailment.

2016-11-26 01:55:25 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

they used to, unless it was undecided. But I think it is more about an invasion of privacy (hence the privacy act), the family may not want that info to be released.

2007-02-27 02:21:51 · answer #4 · answered by Chrissy 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers