English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i am me, i 'have no religion'-when i am healthy, am i 'non-sick'?

2007-02-27 01:59:22 · 10 answers · asked by jon h 3 in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Other - Cultures & Groups

(stop trying to grab crafty points lol)

what i mean is, for example, if i was called a 'non-believer', that to me implies that someone is seeing me as being less than the norm, saying that 'believer' is the main function.
if i am 'atheist', should i call believers 'non-atheists'?...or 'non non-belivevers'?

2007-02-28 01:11:22 · update #1

its also as in 'non-smoker', which makes it sound as though 'smoker' is the norm.

2007-03-02 01:43:47 · update #2

10 answers

non-sense

2007-02-27 02:02:10 · answer #1 · answered by chillipope 7 · 0 0

Non means no. As in NONsense.

I suppose you could be a non religious person. That means that although you believe in religion, you are not overly into it. Therefore we could not use the term atheists.

As for non healthy this would be unhealthy which would mean not healthy. Could something be non healthy? Same meaning different way of saying it.

I think that non is used too much and only should be used if part of a word. Therefore I agree with you in this sense. Get rid of the nonsense. No pun intended.

2007-03-07 05:14:39 · answer #2 · answered by Randy P 3 · 0 0

French equivalent to English "no"
Italian equivalent to English "not"
Latin equivalent to both "not" and "no"

To your question about what to call someone who isn't an atheist.....that would make them either Christian, Jewish, Muslim or whatever their religious choice is.

There you go.... sorry if this is a boring answer to your question.

2007-03-05 15:54:13 · answer #3 · answered by _ 4 · 0 0

whatever helps you sleep at night. believing is the norm, however. very few people are actually atheists at heart.

2007-03-04 18:07:11 · answer #4 · answered by Revelation S 4 · 0 0

Non-nong nano?

2007-03-07 00:43:50 · answer #5 · answered by anobangtanong 3 · 0 0

I believe its just the plural of no .

2007-03-04 13:36:40 · answer #6 · answered by cybergal 2 · 0 0

labels you have enough of em to start your own labeling business..........

2007-03-06 10:12:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes

definitely

2007-02-27 15:40:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

non - comprendo

2007-02-27 12:59:09 · answer #9 · answered by deep in thought 4 · 0 0

....."non" for me, "thank you"

2007-03-07 05:01:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers