Do you think the U.S. should pay to defray the cost of Israel's 2006 Lebanon "adventure?"?

Question

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070226/wl_mideast_afp/mideastisraelusmilitaryaid_070226112551

The third answer indicates I wasn't clear enough. It's Israel that wants money to pay for the cost of its invasion.

Doc: I didn't know Agence France was a whacked out, left wing blogger site. Oh wait, they're French!

And DOc: Learn to speak and/or write English, if you're such a great patriot. It's legitimate, not "legiteamate," and recipient, not "receiptrient." We liberals are really sorry now that we wrecked the U.S. educational system back in the 70s when we were doing the bidding of our Soviet masters. LOL

Answer 1

No, rather Israel should pay costs of destroyed infrastructure to Lebanon, the USA (who was helping rebuild) and the UK (as well heavily invested in Lebanese infrastructure).

Answer 2

You guys keep referring to and posting these blogger sites as though they are legitemate news sources. But then, I suppose that in your warped, perverse and demented, bi-polar paradigmed world, these are "Facts." Say, aren't you truent? Do your parents know you're skipping? Tell you what I think, the Lebanese government allows these terrorists to operate within their borders, launching attacks against civilian targets in neighboring Israel. They accept money and weapons from other terrorist supporting and expotring countries such as Syria and then whine like hell when Israel gives answer to the multiple kidnappings, rocket and motar attacks? Everytime the Israelis offer up a reasonable plan for peace, the agreement gets signed and before the ink has time to dry, the terrorists launch another assault. And that liberal minded morons would have the audacity to ask such stupid questions and imply that a sovereign country does not have the right, obligation or duty to protect itself and its citizenry, shows just how stupid you really are. I invite you to go live there. With any amount of luck and justice, you'll be the polite receiptrient of another errant missile launched by the hezbolla after another peace agreement has been formally signed -- as was the one that killed the 3 year old palestinian in November -- which by the way, was the 49th such attack since the last peace agreement had been signed. Liberal moron. Pay attention to the news and read legitemate history books!

*the following morning*
Oh my! Did I touch a nerve? I apologize for my misspellings and bad phrasiology. I was at work and more than slightly rushed. And, because I own the business, I guess it's alright if I try and take a moment or two to respond.. Still, I strongly suspect that both my IQ and my level of education are considerably higher. And still, the answer to your question is, a resounding no. Unless of course, we're trying to win the hearts and minds of those who allowed their country to be over run with terrorist organizations -- perhaps try and convince them that they really should take back their country... Nah.... Have a great day!

Answer 3

at the starting up i accept as true with all the arab peopple who commented extraordinarily the lebanese ones. i'm 0.5 lebanese myslef, and my dad turned right into an adolescent round my age (16) in the course of the civil warfare in lebanon. he fought the isrealis and many hies acquaintances and memnbers of my kin were killed by those isrealis. so the answer ot your question is not any. the isrealis have not at all gained a warfare any "victory" or "purpose" executed by those a lot turned right into a victory or purpose executed by a overseas means the U.S. assisting the isrealis. they would not exist withou outdoors help. they could no longer have gained the warfare in 2006 becuase HizBollah a military of 500 help offf a military of 5000 and did not enable them boost more suitable than 3 ft in a procedure the way lengthy became that warfare a month. besides the rocket assaults that violated the geneva convention destroyed houses and issues that-get this HizBollah became in a position to payfor and fix. u discern it out.

Answer 4

Of course not. The fact that Israel did a bad job of rolling up the barbarians in Lebanon doesn't mean that the Lebanese are intitled to US money

Answer 5

I am not going to put down what I think. But if Little Baby Zion wants Daddy Warbucks Bush to keep paying his college fund...like I said, I´m not going to put down what I think.

Answer 6

What's new?We've footed the bill for for every Israeli military action since 1967.

The Israeli lobby pretty much controls Congress.

Answer 7

The US masterminded the attack to facilitate the invasion of Iran

Answer 8

ohhhh helll no!!! they make war and we gotta pay for it!!!!! no the hell with them, leave our money at home and put it into education

Answer 9

No.