If women have absolute rights over their body than do they also have right over a mans money?

Question

If a woman has been given the power to become god and decide whether to murder or let an unborn child live in the womb then why are so many women deliberatley getting pregnant even when the men dont want those children?
If females had any self respect and dignity would they ask for child support if the man is against having them and they have absolute right to abort the unborn life?
How many women are surviving on this racket?
Does this mean that the sperm inside a womans body now belongs to her not to the man?
If this is the case then what is the difference between these women and prostitutes??

Infact with prostitutes you pay only once but in the other case you keep on paying for just one lousy mistake.
How can equality ever exist if women are given the power of god??
We talk about unprotected sex and then we say the woman gets paid for it while the man pays for it ,Doesent this sound like prostitution?
Its very simple no rights no payment.
No sex no payment.

Judging from the answers of women to this question i think the future only holds hatred and conflict between the genders.

Well so be it but we did try.

What absolute nonsense a woman can have unprotected sex a man cant ?

If athe sperm inside a womans body doesent belong to him then why should he pay for something that doesent belong to him????

One or the other way these females are parasites.

It is hard to fight or argue with ladies like wendy g and up your nose when they talk about it in this manner.Dear god what man wouldnt protect and provide for his woman ?
Am i talking about that or somethin else.
and please this specific to those women who insult this arrangement its not at all about ladies so please dont take me wrong.

Answer 1

so don't have unprotected sex
you don't need to breed anyway since you have a warped sense of reality

oh, and yes, the sperm you leave inside a woman is no longer your 'property', as it is "exchanging" bodily fluids. all the stuff you get on YOU, is yours.

Answer 2

Oh God, please do you know the trauma and pain of childbearing and child birth? Do you know how far the vagina stretches and that it has to be sewn back? Do you know the physical, sometimes medical and\ PERMANENT impact it has on women who give birth? A man ejaculates ONCE into the woman. The woman carries the child with her for 9 freaking months, pushes it out through her vagina and this process can take up to a few days and probably due to societal influences, bring the child up FOREVER.

All these give women the right to decide whether they want the baby or not, and it earns women respect.

And what you say is a contradiction. You hint that women should not abort, yet if they have the baby you say men have the right not to give them child support. It is the man's mistake too, why shouldnt' they be responsible? Scenario that is COMMON: Girlfriend gets pregnant, boyfriend dumps her. So the boyfriend gets away scot free?

Answer 3

WAR HORSE, you are missing half of the story. Yes I agree with you but women do not rule unilaterally. But all this feminist talk of equality makes men think that they should have the same rights as women too, yet the CHASM that exists (that feminism denies) has two sides to it.

Women would not run the world in a month if they unified together, is it women who run the government, work in engineering, architecture, construction, oil rigs, mines, is it women who built our cities and infrastructure. Did women invent the modern appliances that make it possible for mothers to work outside the home? No, it was men. Even with feminism and quota systems, affirmative action, men still run society, do the dirty, dangerous jobs etc.

In actual fact due to feminism, women are having less children than ever before and the divorce rate is over 50 percent, with women instigating 75 percent of case. Many men are now shunning marriage due to the finacial risks and they can get sex outside marriage, so what is the incentive?

If a countries’ future prosperity is with their children and if one countries population is becoming smaller and another values motherhood and children and at some point this bigger country will have the capacity to dominate another. How will they do this….WAR. (technology plays a large part too, men have something to do with this too?)

And will women develop these lightweight cost effective batteries for the cars you mention in your matriarchal utopia?How about funding for healthcare? What about this living wage, what industries are going to prop up this wonderful standard of living? Hairdressing, beauty therapy, retail therapy LOL!

Problem is women want sex as much a men and what you seem to miss is…there won’t be anymore men in uniform, CEOs entrepreneurs, and confident manly ‘can do’ men anymore, as your feminist utopia won’t allow it…and what are women turned on by? Is it submissive wussie yes-men? LOL

You talk about Arunrajp hopefully not wanting to be homosexual, well these circumstances are more suited to lesbianism and who is at the higher echelons of feminism?

You have just portrayed Valerie Solanas's dream in the Scum Manifesto. Good job son.

Answer 4

Draecoiram-
What you have given it the argument against abortion on demand.
Warhorse-
Read Monad's reply. He's spot on. Women want to rule but don't want to do the dirty or dangerous jobs, therefore, they cannot.
Up your ... nose-
Really. You are messed up in the head. Your hatred has you all imbalanced. The one, most important factor you forgot is that women do not get accidentally pregnant. They know what causes pregnancy and have a plethura of methods to avoid it.
Your "common" factor of dad disappearing is actually more common for dad to be forced out against his wishes.
Women who choose to raise their children are simply finishing the job they started when they chose to breed. And many women are choosing to abandon their child whether through "safe haven" avenues or just dumping them in trash bins.
As far as men wanting to have some input, you seem to feel this is sacreligious, which it probably is to your feminist worshipping ideals. Imagine, a father that love his children. How postively odd, huh?
As long as women have all the options, they should also happily take the responsibility that goes with those rights. Typically, most women do, feminists shudder at the thought of being held responsible for their actions.
Wendy-
Also, yours is also an argument against abortion on demand.
No matter if a woman's religion forbids abortion, it is STILL A CHOICE. One that is denied men who must accept woman's decision, regardless. It is abundantly obvious that women who do not want to become a parent and are against abortion for whatever reason have several other options besides parenthood and abortion. Again, denied to men.
You may be tired of hearing about women living off of child support but you cannot even imagine what it is like to be the one supporting her lazy butt. I have and I've seen it a thousand times over. It's all around you unless you choose to close your eyes.
No amount of posturing will forgive women who demand extra options in birth control, abortion, parenthood or any of the other "extras" feminists demand until they also accept the responsibilities that go with it. In the case of having all the options in procreation, they must also accept total support of those children without outside assistance whether by the father or the surrogate father: the government.

Answer 5

If a man doesn't want children, why did he engage in an act (unprotected sex) that could very well lead to fathering a child? It is foolish to assume that the woman WILL have an abortion, what if her religion forbids it? The fact is, the man is being negligent by engaging in an act that will lead to undesired consequences for him, by the law, a person who is negligent is culpable. Men have the right to protect themselves from "unwanted children" by USING protection.
And I'm tired of people saying "women are 'living off of child support'" and "scamming men" by getting pregnant. Pregnancy is biologically AND socially "expensive" for women. Women are more likely to lose their job when they fall pregnant, and women with children have to give up certain aspects of their career (like working a lot of overtime) especially if they are single parents.Women by no means get a "free ride" when it comes to pregnancy, especially if they decide to keep the baby. You're acting as if they do. Men who don't want to pay for their "negligence" are the ones wanting a free ride. And our government is not going to pay for a man's mistake by having to give out government assistance to single moms whose "baby's daddy" decided he didn't want to pay.
And does "his sperm" now belongs to her? Well, he gave it away freely, didn't he? (lol)
The point is that EACH PERSON is responsible for protecting their own reproductive rights. Women may have more options, but men have the right and ability to protect themselves against women who would get pregnant and "hamper" him with child support, and he should exercise that right.

EDIT--"Phil #3"-Why are ignoring the choice that men have to protect themselves in the first place? If more men who are "supporting her lazy butt" had exercised that right, they would not be in the situation they are in, would they? Women have more options, because of basic biology, and because they have more at stake physically and financially, (her ability to concentrate solely on her career, take more overtime, etc.) And I don't know ONE single mom who doesn't also work, so how is it "lazy" to work full time and raise a child alone? And men who pay child support aren't supporting the woman, anyway, they are supporting their children. Also, you mention women "taking resposibility"-women who choose to keep and raise their children aren't taking responsibility? And what about the responsibility of the man who acted negligently? Honestly, I would be all for some sort of "opt out" option, IN THE EVENT that that man truly tried to protect himself from unwanted children, and didn't leave it up to someone else, but that protection failed. I don't think women are perfect beings, some can and do try to "abuse the system", but frankly, I have never met a "rich" single mom, have you?

Answer 6

I read this question before I checked to see who posted it. I guessed right....only a GUY would post this question. Not that it’s a bad question dude, don't get me wrong. But a chick would never even have to ASK this question.....because women are born with the answer to this question already built into their instincts.

Questions like this serve only to continually emphasize the CHASM that exists between the sexes.

The answer to your question is YES. Women have the power of god, concerning all things reproductive, and their own bodies. They have the pvssy, they make the rules.

Women have the power of god, concerning all things financial, (including your wallet) and their own bodies. They have the pvssy, they make the rules.

Women are smart enough to ask for financial support, even when MEN didn't want kids, because they have the pvssy, they make the rules.
Unless you raped her, she didn't ask YOU for pvssy, YOU ASKED her. Nothing in this world is free my Man. ESPECIALLY pvssy.

Women do not force guys to remove condoms at gunpoint, just at the point of no return. Nope. No Sir. Never gonna happen EXCEPT in a porno.

YOU want the pvssy? YOU hit the pvssy? YOU did / did NOT wear a condom ? Guess what son? That is called a LIFE LESSON of biblical proportions. Now you gonna pay.

And NO that does not make her a prostitute. Try that argument on your own grandmother, mother, Aunt, or sister, and ask them if THEY are HOs. That would be called LIFE LESSON of biblical proportions #2!

If you want to survive in this world son, you have to realize the laws of supply and demand. Those with the supplies make the rules. Those who demand said supplies have no power if they want those supplies. They agree to the rules or GO WITHOUT. The only recourse those with the demand have is to change those demands to something else. OK...now in real terms.....

Assuming you want pvssy sometime again in your life, you have to AGREE to the RULES. WOMEN make the rules because they have the Supply of pvssy. YOU, ME, guys in general play by the rules, pay the price, or we change the demand to something else. I am assuming you DO NOT want to become homosexual....

If women put a unified effort together, they would RUN the world within a month. The war in Iraq would stop, terrorism would stop, crime would stop, guns would be controlled, cars would run on batteries, universal health care would abound, everyone would make a living wage, and Dancing with the Stars would be the only show on TV....WHY? Because the power of the pvssy is universal!
Men would happily, (and quickly) turn over the world, if they knew they could never get ANY .....Anymore.

Answer 7

I believe that some women do make a living out of getting child support, but most don't. What is wrong with a man taking charge of birth control, or not engaging in sex with a woman who says she is not protected ?

Answer 8

If the women gets pregnant for such selfish purposes and the man does not want the baby, then there should be absolutely no obligation for him to be involved and he should not be ordered to pay maintenance. Simple as that, I think that is fair enough.

HTH.

Answer 9

WHAT IS A CRANK? DEFINITION OF A CRANK:

"Crank" is a pejorative term for a person who

1. holds some belief which the vast majority of his contemporaries would consider false,
2. clings to this belief in the face of all counterarguments or evidence presented to him.

The term implies that
-"cranky" belief is so wildly at variance with some commonly accepted truth as to be ludicrous,
- arguing with the crank is useless, because he will invariably dismiss all evidence or arguments which contradict his cranky belief.
- Common synonyms for "crank" include kook and crackpot. The word quack is usually reserved for someone who promotes a medical remedy or practice which he knows to be ineffective.

The crank differs from the fanatic in that the subject of the fanatic's obsession is not necessarily widely regarded as wrong, or a "fringe" belief.

INTERNET CRANKS
The rise of the Internet has given another outlet to people well outside the mainstream who may get labeled cranks through internet postings or websites promoting particular beliefs. There are a number of websites devoted to listing people as cranks, with one of the best-known being Crank Dot Net.[1]

Common characteristics of cranks
Virtually universal characteristics of cranks include:

1. Cranks overestimate their own knowledge and ability, and underestimate that of acknowledged experts.
2. Cranks insist that their alleged discoveries are urgently important.
3. Cranks rarely if ever acknowledge any error, no matter how trivial.
4. Cranks love to talk about their own beliefs, often in inappropriate social situations, but they tend to be bad listeners, and often appear to be uninterested in anyone else's experience or opinions.

Some cranks exhibit a lack of academic achievement, in which case they typically assert that academic training in the subject of their crank belief is not only unnecessary for discovering "the truth", but actively harmful because they believe it "poisons" the minds by teaching falsehoods. Others greatly exaggerate their personal achievements, and may insist that some alleged achievement in some entirely unrelated area of human endeavor implies that their cranky opinion should be taken seriously.

Some cranks claim vast knowledge of any relevant literature, while others claim that familiarity with previous work is entirely unnecessary; regardless, cranks inevitably reveal that whether or not they believe themselves to be knowledgeable concerning relevant matters of fact, mainstream opinion, or previous work, they are not in fact well-informed concerning the topic of their belief.

In addition, many cranks
1. seriously misunderstand the mainstream opinion to which they believe that they are objecting,
2. stress that they have been working out their ideas for many decades, and claim that this fact alone entails that their belief cannot be dismissed as resting upon some simple error,
3, compare themselves with Galileo or Copernicus, implying that the mere unpopularity of some belief is in itself evidence of plausibility,
4. claim that their ideas are being suppressed by secret intelligence organizations, mainstream science, powerful business interests, or other groups which, they allege, are terrified by the possibility of their allegedly revolutionary insights becoming widely known,
5. appear to regard themselves as persons of unique historical importance.

The psychology of cranks
Virtually universal characteristic of cranks:
they simultaneously overestimate their own knowledge and ability and underestimate that of other persons, including that of acknowledged experts in the field.

Kruger and Dunning hypothesized that with regard to a typical skill which humans may possess in greater or lesser degree,
1. incompetent individuals tend to overestimate their own level of skill,
2. incompetent individuals fail to recognize genuine skill in others,
3. incompetent individuals fail to recognize the extremity of their inadequacy...

These results are taken to explain why cranks so often seem to represent, not individuals with an exceptional degree of knowledge, but rather individuals with an exceptional degree of ignorance concerning the subject of their cranky belief.

As noted above, in addition to a general lack of ability to accurately assess their own skills and knowledge, many cranks also exhibit deficiencies in reading comprehension, logical reasoning, and other cognitive abnormalities, which may contribute both to how they arrive at some bizarre counterfactual belief in the first place, and to how they are able to cling to such a belief in the face of all objections.

It is also striking that many cranks seem to exhibit certain symptoms of grandiosity or megalomania. This may perhaps also be understood, in terms of the phenomenon studied by Kruger and Dunning, as resulting from a simultaneous overinflation of their own social value and underestimation of the social value of others".

Source(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/crank_%28pe...