Good point! He is no longer a viable politician - just a stooge in the liberal Hollywood machine. His work of fiction should be looked at as such. It has a good song though.
2007-02-27 01:52:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Leah 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think Al Gore is trying and succeeding with a documentary that has received a lot of positive recognition.
Michael Moore had the nerve to produce a couple of documentaries that are based in fact (or would have been sued) but ruffled a lot of people. I hope that YOU watched Fahrenheit 9/11 but I bet you didn't.
I have found that if people don't like the message, the attack the people who developed it. You are a prime example.
Propaganda might be WMD (not there but needed the thought to get war approval) or how about Iraq and its uranium enrichment programme (not there). Right now we see propaganda on Iran the same as we did on Iraq.
Think for yourself and I don't care how a person looks but its the integrity of the person that counts.
2007-02-27 11:27:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dave 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Michael Moore has made a career from 'outing' people that he believes should be disgraced. Al Gore has not.
Propaganda? Are you calling Global Warming propaganda? I guess all the scientists that the other countries are listening to, instead of making it into a political issue, are also losers? Sigh.
And weight issues? Thats your big point? Good God...did you not know that America is the most obese country IN THE WORLD???? Throwing stones for being fat is taking a shot at 78% of Americans!
2007-02-27 09:54:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Super Ruper 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well Al is willing to debate unlike Michael Moore who can't back up any of his accusations with even theory...unless it's conspiracy theory.
Global Climate Change is a plausible theory but just that a THEORY we know it's happening we're just not sure how, why or what will be the end result....it's all happened before and it will all happen again.
Al Gore does however need to practice what he preaches..
http://tennesseepolicy.org/main/article.php?article_id=367
2007-02-27 10:42:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by sprydle 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The list "goes on and on" and you only mention three items?
Hmmm...
And as for this: "Michael Moore is born a looser..."
1. At least he knows how to spell.
2. It's kind of hard to agree that a multi-millionaire could be classified as a loser. Or even a "looser" for that matter
2007-02-27 09:45:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Timothy B 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
I sure hope not. Michael Moore is a tool. ...also, it's loser, not looser.
2007-02-27 12:10:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its spelled "loser".
Rove,Cheney,Bush: Propaganda,lawbreakers.
Hello?
2007-02-27 10:09:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. They both care deeply about the Earth. Why is Bush Jr. emulating Mussolini?
2007-02-27 09:41:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
Your point is a good one! I agree...
Watch out for the Manbearpig, though, it threatens our very existence! ;)
2007-02-27 09:39:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by sillycanuckpei 4
·
4⤊
3⤋
Have you ever seen the two of them together?????? HHHUUUUM I wounder..........
2007-02-27 09:40:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Boston Mark 5
·
4⤊
3⤋