2007-02-27 00:37:47 · 44 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder...well, I understand that quote better now
2007-02-28 15:34:55 · answer #1 · answered by EvelynMine 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sweety--I kept telling U over and Over again to get ur eye checked and double checked--Now not even God can save u--i wonder if they have miracle surgeries to remove ur eyes and implant it with an OWLS-u wud have large pretty eyes Just like Camilla--whatever--wonder wot the royal prince saw in her-when he had everythin in Di--tsk;tsk-like they say Love is blind--ur getting there so no problemo for u dear
2007-02-27 06:21:43 · answer #2 · answered by cherark 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's not a glamour girl, that's for sure, but in her own way, she ... oh, never mind. People will always think of Charles & Diana, and following Diana is almost impossible because people will make comparisons, and there is still anger over Diana's death. Just as long as Charles & Camilla are happy; I suppose that's what counts. At least they have each other.
2007-02-27 01:50:47 · answer #3 · answered by SB 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I wouldn't call her pretty but she isn't ugly. Handsome would fit her well. There are many women who would like to look as good as she does at 60.
Diana was pretty and she did the job she was chosen for - she produced two heirs. Charles did his duty by Diana but continued with the love of his life. This was the way things had been done for centuries - sleep with whoever you like but marry a virgin to produce an heir. Charles saw it that way but Diana didn't.
2007-02-27 02:07:46 · answer #4 · answered by tentofield 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Beauty is only skin deep.
Although if that's the case, Camilla must be inside out!
2007-02-27 00:43:12 · answer #5 · answered by leedsmikey 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I'm still mad at what she did to Diana in the beginning of their marriage. She could've been more of a lady and a decent person and backed off for a while.
2007-02-27 03:51:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To Prince Charles she is and in essence he's the only one who really counts .
Camilla is who she is,a woman in her fifties who isn't obsessed with her image or her looks or her fashion. She's comfortable in her own skin and be damned what the public around the world thinks.
2007-02-27 00:42:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
To be honest with you she looks like my late Grandma. Kindly, sturdy, and with a bit of a haughty aristocratic edge. But even in her prime I would have hesitated to call her pretty. But you are joking, right?
2007-02-27 02:51:47 · answer #8 · answered by Alyosha 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Looks have nothing to do with it as it obviously becomes apparent with Camilla - dont get me started on this one please.
2007-02-27 04:16:13 · answer #9 · answered by deep in thought 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, that's more of a statement than a question, but she's pretty in Charles' eyes too. And other poeples too, who knows?
2007-02-27 02:19:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋