Should U.S or england host the 2018 world cup nd why?
2007-02-27 00:33:30 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ Other - Football
US has a far better infrastructure, and the number of people who attended the last US-hosted games is still a record.
2007-02-27 02:57:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
England should host the 2018 world cup because they have a better field, and more people will come to see the game if they had it there.
2007-02-27 00:43:11 · answer #2 · answered by LilJ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The US. Having the world cup in the US is as close to having it in a neutral sight as possible.
2007-02-27 02:45:58 · answer #3 · answered by playmaker4747 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like the idea of England where the Stadiums are closer together.
2007-02-27 00:54:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
USA, why not?
We proved in 1994 that we can handle the worlds biggest party.
Now it's time for an encore.
2007-02-27 01:54:04 · answer #5 · answered by azsoccerfan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
U.S they have stronger teams
2007-02-27 00:40:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The US, so it's closer to me!
2007-02-27 00:39:23 · answer #7 · answered by TJTB 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋