I don't think congress has declared war since WWII. Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq aren't declared wars to my knowledge.
2007-02-26 23:43:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Under the War Powers Act of 1973, Congress has the sole right to declare war and the President has the sole right to be Commander in Chief. Congress can indeed tie the hands of the Commander in Chief regarding the progress of a declared war. If the President does not like this law he should take it to the Supreme Court.
2007-02-27 03:17:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by jcboyle 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't forget about the conflicts in Beirut and Kosavo. Sorry if I misspelled the second one, the spell checker didn't have the right one as an option.
President Clinton sent guided missiles to those countries without declaring war.
Um... they did give President Bush permission to invade Iraq. They just changed their mind afterwards. Also, it's not like Saddam Hussein wasn't warned. He was given an ultimatum, either let the inspectors do their job or we would invade. He chose the latter.
2007-02-27 00:53:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Love YHWH with all of oneself 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
unquestionably, no one declared warfare. Congress authorized the President to apply rigidity, yet there has no longer been a suitable statement of warfare. besides the incontrovertible fact that, by way of fact the President is Comander-in-chief it is not completely sparkling he desires their permission, yet needless to say he would not want to be the only one on checklist as asserting this could be a sturdy concept. we've not formally declared warfare on everybody in view that WWII. Korea, Vietnam. barren area hurricane, Afghanistan, Iraq all have the characteristics linked with warfare, yet are no longer unquestionably wars by way of fact the USA Congress by no skill declared warfare. those have been very vast police movements. They regarded like wars, talked like wars, yet lacked the criminal status of a warfare. "The warfare Powers Act" and different products of history from the Vietnam ear rfile a rustic attempting to make experience of what it skill to have the President be Commander-in-chief and the Congress have the potential to declare warfare. What we've been given is that Congress by no skill pronounces warfare, however the President consults Congress in the previous he orders troops into what regular human beings might call a warfare. The President has declared a worldwide warfare on terror (that's what feds could desire to call it, the State branch sent a memo) yet legally that's a rhetorical warfare like "the warfare on Poverty" or the "the warfare on drugs."
2016-09-29 23:34:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The U.S. has sent military forces into combat areas without congressional approval at least 100 times since the Civil War. Many people forget about Lebanon, Costa Rica, Granada etc.
2007-02-27 05:07:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by infamousdzero 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you mean the american congress? Your question is not very clear, do you mean each time the american soldiers wage a real-time war in a foreign country without it being aknowledged by their congress? Oh gee, I can think of plenty of those, and each one debatable. How about Guatemala in 1954 for instance?
good luck!
2007-02-26 23:40:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋