2007-02-26 22:42:27 · 17 answers · asked by prakash c 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
He was the epitome of 'tolerance and non-violence'.
He led India to their successful independent struggle.
He is said to be the Father of the Nation.
You should watch 'Lage Raho Munnabhai' to know more in a comical way.
2007-02-27 02:20:46 · answer #1 · answered by Oye chak de phatte!! 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
From where did you get this marvellous piece of information ? Mr. Gandhi was not responsible for the death of Bhagat Singh, Sukh Deo and Rajguru. Though he believed in non-violence, he held the trio in high esteem as true patriots.
2007-02-28 06:02:07 · answer #2 · answered by Tapan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is a not true that Mr MK Gandhi is responsible for their death. Since they believe in the armed uprising to throw the British empire out, as result Britishers felt that they are more dangerous than MKG. That is why the Britishers did not spare them.
2007-02-27 07:00:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
In fact Bharat Maataa was, in first place, responsible for everything. It was Bhagat Singh's own devotion to Bharat Maataa's inner wish, responsible for not only his death but of Sukhdeo and Rajguru's too. Like wise Mr.Gandhi's devotion and his own choice, awarded him three bullets' in his pious heart.
No Indians are to blame no Indians. Are you Indian or...........?
2007-03-01 07:28:51 · answer #4 · answered by vishw_paramaatmaa_parivaar 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I am a feel Ghandhi is responsible for it. If he want he can save the life of Sukhdev, Bhagat and Rajguru.
2007-03-02 08:22:06 · answer #5 · answered by bindiya 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A single man, lead our nation to freedom and glory....it is because of him today you have your question raised on this site.
Lets face it....this led him to immortal fame. A person who is famous has his own good sides and bad sides. The limelight is on him and if someone is praising that figure then someone is also critising. As far as the death of Bhagat Singh and the ohter revolutionaries is concerned, the fact is dat since these people didnt have a large following and the british was able to crush them easily.
Violence is truly not the answer or solution to anything....it was entrely their own fault and they didnt mind getting executed....they took it as their "balidaan" for the country.
Dont raise questions on whats happened in the past....its happened....dont point fingers on people who arent ther in this world anymore....instead lets take it as a learning
wat say??
2007-02-27 11:41:15 · answer #6 · answered by shreya t 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Due you know the death due to Tsunami is not due to Tsunami. I have proof to show it is carelessness of T.V.Stations who ignored my warning and the meteorological department who's ignorance on this subject resulted in the mass death.My self and the meteorological department sensed the earthquake waves same time that is 2 hours before it struck our coast.I have issued the warning they failed to issue the warning. Why our people not taking proper action whose failure caused the death.
2007-02-27 06:57:03 · answer #7 · answered by A.Ganapathy India 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's why The great Nathuram Godse shot him dead.
Jai Hind.
2007-02-27 23:43:32 · answer #8 · answered by anoop_pattat 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where did you get all this crap from? Altough Gandhiji opposed their fundamentals of violence, he respected them as true patriots. Read my answer to your previous question. And next time take care, not to post any question based on assumptions...
:-)
2007-02-27 14:48:04 · answer #9 · answered by plato's ghost 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All the people you have named are great sons of India . They all sacrificed their life for the love of their motherland.
2007-03-02 01:44:17 · answer #10 · answered by GANESH BHAT 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋