No, death is the begining of the actual life.
2007-02-26 22:29:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by mphermes 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
death temporarily ends existence. whether, Revelation 214 refers to death as a former subject. Revelation 20: 13 says the Grave and death and the sea gave up the ineffective in it. consequently there's a desire of a resurrection for people who've died. Even, Revelation 6: 8 personifies death, by skill of asserting 'rides on a horse' however the Grave follows it heavily at the back of. So there'll come an end to death! those are in basic terms a number of the guarantees God has given. Now are you able to think of the kind of international we would be residing in? what variety of society does God promise? How will he carry it? The Bible supplies us a pleasing answer.
2016-10-16 21:13:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by ramayo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Death is not the end of life. Life exists after we die. I have experienced it when I went into a full arrest when I was 15 years old. I was somewhere aware of my surrounding and not in the hospital. I went through that tunnel of light. I saw beautiful mountains and a valley with a dirt road going down the hill on the other side. Then they brought me back. I am convinced of an afterlife.
2007-02-26 22:22:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by greylady 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
its cycle that's the answers to all queries like this question.
in a cycle u can choose ur beginning or ur end.don't think life as a linear living pattern.its spiral actually and got feedback from so many life times.
lets elaborate it further:
we lived so many roles during a single life time.sometimes as a father then as a son then as a employee and series never ends.
Good thing is if u r really alert for all those coincidences u will come to realize that all happenings n mishappening were necessary for u becoz without that u would have been completely different.
so if u want another start or another end its ur choice..becoz its spiral having mvrous feedback of learning lessons.
Be aware and all ur answers come automatically from urself alone..and have patience..but never stop asking questions to urself.
all the best buddy
2007-02-26 22:33:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by eternal_rahi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There can be no physical evidence of life after death, since it involves a metaphysical transgression.
There is, however, sufficient logic in my view. The fact that we own our physical body and use it as a physical means to fulfill our desires and purposes, is the proof that death (which inactivates our body) would force us to leave our useless body and look for any possible alternate means to fulfill our desires and purposes.... unless of course one presumes that death kills our desires and purposes as well.... which presumption does not seem logical to me at all.
In other words, we are more than just a physical body and our end can not depend on the end of the body; our end would logically depend on the complete extinguishing of our desires and purposes.
Indeed it is just a belief, but to me it looks highly logical..... certainly more logical than the belief as though it is total curtains on death.
2007-02-27 00:13:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by small 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
How do people reconcile the xth version of the afterlife with different, conflicting versions of other religions? I suppose they believe their religion is the only real, True Religion. Sure. Just like all the others do too.
Fact: the human race has been around for hundreds of thousands of years.
Fact: the concepts of an afterlife, of gods, spirits, etc. have only been around for a few millenia.
Fact: these concepts were invented and promulgated by ignorant barbarians as an attempt to explain the world around them, before there was a such thing as science or epistemology.
Fact: most of the books of the bible were written by people who were never there, as second- or third-hand accounts decades or even centuries after the events they claim to tell about.
Fact: the books of the bible have been heavily edited over the centuries, with passages or even whole books being re-written or omitted to fit the theological and political climates of the time.
Fact: the books of the bible have also been subject to extensive errors, misinterpretations, and differences of opinion in interpretation as they are translated from one language to another and from that to yet another language.
Knowing all this, how can ANY religion be viewed as anything BUT the invention of men? I know this may not be what you want to hear, and I doubt I'll do much harm to your faith; faith is remarkably impervious to reason. But we atheists are nothing like what the church leaders are fond of charicaturing us as.
We are freethinking individuals who are able to see the Big Picture without the blinders of religion. We do not live in despair, quite the contrary; freethought is incredibly refreshing, liberating, and empowering. We are not nihilists, but lovers of life who see it as all the more precious because there's no eternal afterlife.
We do not need the bribe of heaven or the threat of hell to be good people, we believe in being good for its own sake. Through science and reason, we know more about the true nature of the world we live in than a religion could ever hope to offer.
I'd ask you to give freethought a try, but I realize that's probably asking too much for a True Believer. So I'll only ask that you consider learning more about atheists and atheism, and setting aside any preconceived notions you may have about them--because those notions are almost certainly wrong. We are not your enemy. Our quarrel is with irrationality, wishful thinking, superstitions, intellectual dishonesty, and all other forms of thinking that keep mankind mired in darkness, ignorance and hate.
2007-02-27 11:51:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
This has to be for the making of a very fine point here. First of all, there are two regions: life and death. And just one question: is there life-after-death? Now if there are two distinct regions then where exactly is the line separating them, where is the boundary that when people cross do not come back? The fact is that the line between life and death is a region unexplored.
There may be instances of people relating their near-death experiences where, according to them, ‘they can back’, but I thinking the actual knowledge of life-after-death can only be traced in the life we have now.
Just by observing this life rightly, instead of trying to peek into somewhere that is just in our imaginative mind, where it could be completely devoid of life, we must contemplate life before death - a proof that there is life-after-death, in its essence this is a matter of victory of life over death. Besides, it does not feel right while living that it will end abruptly someday.
The proof of life after death is in the life before death, the life we have here and now. The distinction between life and death is not ambiguous, it is clear, life is life and death is death, and if there is life after death then death does not exist as we might imagine, but a transmutation of life into another type of living.
Instinct for survival is the basis of human nature; life is of paramount important to us all; we like to live loner, and in fact forever; we just do not want to end up not being around; we value things of life, the things that enhance life and make life comfortable, pleasant and beautiful; such is the love of life ingrained into our mind that take care of each other and those who are not even human but living; we love our children and respect our elders all this is for the love of live. We are alive and we like to eternalise this feeling, and we like to celebrate living.
But is this all when it comes to defining love of our life? Of course not, there is more, a whole lot more. There are things that dear to us than anything that life can bring us; we sacrifice our life, our comforts, and our joys for the sack of our causes, missions and purpose that are larger and grander than life. If life more than life we see, if life is grander than what can encounter death then that something will not die, and life will go on.
2007-02-26 23:00:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Shahid 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
nobody can say for a fact that consciousness persists after death. of course, how can that be possible. those who claim to have near-death experiences "walking through the white tunnel" have been medically explained as the hallucination caused by the brain shutting down.
so, my answer is NO, there is no evidence.
i believe that religion was made and continues to have its grasp on society because of its function in society- control of human behavior through fear of consequences. as the jingle goes, "...so be good for goodness sake." i believe that human beings are capable of thinking of what is right and wrong without the consequences such as eternal damnation. laws drafted for society when implemented justly are enough.
2007-02-26 22:41:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by kristeen84211 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have read many accounts of Near Death Experiences (NDE) and also trip reports from people experimenting with esoteric compounds. They see amazing things. I don't know if it is evidence of life after death, but I do know that the subject of NDE is fascinating..
Have you read any of those accounts?
2007-02-26 22:19:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sereny 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Time only exists in our experience of incarnation. To put it simply, we are all spirits, like a conscious energy force, and we've created a material world of infinite possibility. It is somewhat limited in time however, but this is necessary for creation. Just like a painter won't use an infinite canvas to do his work of art....he will choose something like a square meter of paper/sheet. We use a 2000 billion year universe.
So no, there is no end, it's just a creation among infinite other possible ones.
2007-02-26 23:02:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋