In the Schapelle Corby Case how was evidence collected and conviction occured??

Question

case study on her

Answer 1

Brittany S.; It should BE mentioned, her e that when
-in the que- Schapelle was asked by [someone:
maybe an "undercover" 'hippie'], IF she had a 'smoke'..
-og 'grass'; Schappelle (stupidly).. indicated: "yes"!

A few seconds later she was CAUGHT, ("red-handed"):
-according to the Indonesian Immigratsi. Dept. officers..
-with aprox. 4.2 kilos of 'High-Grade' Cannabis.. -IN her bag: a"Boogie" bag; a bag that would've felt [weirdly] heavier.. .

(Just quietly; [most folks] IN Australia, think that Schapelle..
is a 'First-Rate' ..actress..).
Post Script: For some [unknown reason], the Indonesian Authorities DID NOT take ANY [finger-prints] of those ON
that PLASTIC -containing the Marijuana.. (which is strange!)..

Answer 2

I help Schapelle too - yet your Iraq analogy is fully incorrect and has similarities to evaluating apples to oranges. John Howard can not impact the court gadget of Indonesia (it extremely relies on the Dutch criminal gadget), nor of the different u . s . a . - nor ought to Kim Beazley if he grow to be in potential Indonesia's court structures are out of whack - inspect the term imposed on that scum Abu Bakir Bashir.. after which evaluate to the sentencing of Schapelle. In Indonesia hands get greased a ways too oftentimes of their government, police tension and armed forces

Answer 3

I dont really know but it's really fishy how they didnt check for finger prints on the bag that the drugs were in.