Indian president is a very responsible role when compared to other jobs. And a person in a post like president should be very experienced enough to judge a criminal whether he deserves hanging or not. He should pass bills according to the legislative members' votes. So we choose a experienced person as our president. It doesn't relate to age. And if retirement age is increased to 60 years, the youngsters who deserve jobs will be disappointed. And there is some fact that some families face financial difficulties after retirement...but on taking the majority persons requirements, it is right to give jobs to youngsters only. You think of yourselves only.... in your job getting age, if the retirement age is more than 58 years, do you get the job? So think of all other youngsters like this and allow them to occupy jobs. Youth is like a pillor to nation.
2007-02-26 20:05:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥ ΛDIƬΥΛ ♥ ııllllııllıı 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The government officials are supposed to use their brain and hence mental thinking needs more energy which they use for 58 years their brain needs peace and rest.Any extra strain on their brain may give bad results that may effect their health and our National interest. But that's not the case with the President.All the mental exercise is shared by the council of Ministers.In case of any further clarification he can seek the same from the Hon'ble chief justice of the Supreme court of India. Hence his brain cells does'nt lose as much energy as that of the government officials.so his retirement age is kept at 60 years
2007-02-27 08:19:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by vijayasree n 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
being a president needs a lot of xperience about politics as well as life.but being at work means u r doin what ur best at. that is in a particular feild. so the companies can get new recruits for the same job. so why should they keep old and lethaqrgic people when the can get energetic people who have just passed out of college.i think sitting at home is better than the tiresome office job. even so u can do some creative work sitting at home
2007-02-27 06:00:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Suraj 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The retirement age in the US is 65 or 67 now. 58 would be cool.
2007-02-27 05:06:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mysteri O 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
when there are no jobs for the millions of engineers, doctors ,professionals and teachers in this country ,do you think it a wise step by government to block the chances of these poor fellows by extending retirement age to 60. I think it is more justified that the retired personnels who have vast experience of administration and social public relation join the politics to somewhat reduce the dearth of educated and experieced politicians in indian political system.
2007-02-27 06:59:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by sonu 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Retirement comes after a long spell of working whereas President is elected every five years. Post of President is not a profession whereas only professionals retire.
2007-02-27 04:47:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by hanvis 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why can't it be possible, when almost 70% of Indiam politicians are 60+
2007-02-27 07:58:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by K_Rox 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are eligible now to enter politics anfd enjoy Taxpayers money till you are alive
2007-02-27 08:58:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Brahmanda 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA ACTS ON THE ADVICE OF COUNCIL OF MINISTERS AND DOES NOT APPLY HIS MIND BUT PEOPLE IN SERVICE HAVE TO USE THEIR MINDS SO SENILITY HAS NO PLACE IN SERVICE.
2007-02-27 11:51:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
elected persons had no age bar but employeed recruted
2007-02-27 08:06:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by keral 6
·
0⤊
0⤋