yes it is sad when some really need it you find these pathetic losers scamming the system, it amazing me how that works,,, and whats worse is they seem to be buying drugs with welfare assistants, and their kids are still going without ,,, grrrrr
2007-02-26 19:34:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by mala 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
welfare payments are small and this type of abuse should be reported and is but you see where the system fails,if dcf/hrs workers cleared the welfare roles and they are no longer neede where would they go to have a job?? if someone out there is on welfare and driving a mercedes then they have another income source or someone else pays the bill catch 22 is those who use it as a helping hand need it to start over will lose it if we close it and the ones who abuse it and make it a way of life will just continue on doing what they are doing. To solve it raise the wages in this country so people dont need it and get this country back to a working country. Government issue of free food to those who need it should be there, But a system should be in place that requires participants to obtain work and become a wage earner and if there income is not enough to support them then help them,retal assistace to those who work not those who dont food for those who try yes those who dont hey get a job, Americans do not stick together we can make change if we stand up for a change. Report it and keep reporting it hard to prove abuse in a system that abuses its own system look at government waste ?
2007-02-26 23:00:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, it is a big problem. I've seen this as well and they are scamming the government BIG time. I had called two different times on the same people, and they never did anything about it. They still got their money, food plus grants for college.
2007-02-26 20:27:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by chole_24 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You report them to HRS/DCF. No one driving a luxury car should have EBT cards! They have to be committing fraud! Call the abuse hotline anonymously and report this to the proper authorities!
2007-02-26 19:38:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Being a Christian, i'm obligated to be completely loving of a (skill spouse and anybody for that remember. i'd by no skill show any anger in the direction of a female for no actual reason (except after marriage I have been given cheated on or something of that nature.) So i'm one in each and every of those "super" adult males, and that i'm decently clever. whether I do lack a lot of self belief, because of the fact getting rejected by skill of a female in a super crowd is in all probability my #a million concern in existence... i don't concern death, yet I concern that. Heck I had in basic terms been to Richmond on my own for the 1st time in my existence, or everywhere close to that length in any respect by skill of myself for that remember (kinda have been given thrust into college superb after being abode schooled all my existence). or maybe this would not even examine to the above concern. and that i think of i can communicate for many individuals like me in that because of the fact of this females by no skill get the super adult males. Plus i'm keen to admit i'm in all probability incredibly boring. And it is in all probability additionally yet another turn off. i'm in basic terms an conventional technical geek who likes to play video games and layout stuff everywhere from legos to custom made levels/ameliorations for video games. So what if i can get a three.9 GPA in Mechanical Engineering, i will not be able to even ask a female out. i ought to tell you procedures to apply integration to sparkling up for the quantity of an exceedingly complicated 3 dimensional graphed merchandise making use of triple integration, yet i does not have the skill to tell you something on the subject of the artwork of relationship in besides. i'd be keen to grant away my genius any day to have a female buddy.... Being 20 and nearing 21 and not making use of a single one is sufficient to tension me loopy.
2016-10-16 21:08:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋