English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So that Bush wont be able to do another 911?? according to:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501

2007-02-26 16:21:15 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Media & Journalism

6 answers

Aces.

2007-02-26 16:24:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

What a lot of people don't seem to understand, especially people who don't particularly care for Bush (I happen to be one of them) is that Bush is just a front man - he's not the one pulling the levers so to speak. He comes out and gives pre-prepared speeches, photo ops, and public relations things, but the sad truth is that the majority of our govt. is run by people behind-the-scenes who are not elected by anyone and are not really accountable to anyone. If something happened to him, the VP (who in reality is probably more in the loop than GWB is) would take over and nothing would change other than the running of the country would be more direct. Our enemies realize this - they just tried to take out Cheney in Afghanistan, nobody's even bothering with Bush. Cheney was also called on the carpet by the Saudis a little while back concerning issues they have - they know where the real power lies. The majority of the American people are the only ones who are in the dark.

2007-02-27 05:10:50 · answer #2 · answered by the phantom 6 · 1 0

President Bush wouldn't need to be taking up so much time fighting the War on Terror - if Bill & Hillary didnt spend all their's encouraging the terrorists . And the Clinton's wouldn't like that wall you are talking about . They wouldn't even listen to national security concerns from the Secret Service or the FBI in the Clinton White House . Communist guests of the Clintons without security clearance was business as usual .. We'd still like to know what the Clinton's risked Sandy Berger's freedom for , when they sent him to steal classified documents from the national archives ..Maybe Berger's potential imprisonment wasn't as big a risk to the Democrat party - as jailing the Clinton's would have been - if certain news was made public ?? What ever it was - Sandy Berger accepted the risk of prison doing it .

2007-02-27 00:56:03 · answer #3 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0 2

Now that's a good idea. Give him a taste of his own medicine. It's a shame the way that he is destroying the United States! Lock them all in there. That Condoleeza too!

2007-02-27 00:35:57 · answer #4 · answered by DARMADAKO 4 · 2 2

Make sure it is high enough so that Bush dosent climb and come the other side.

2007-02-27 04:13:27 · answer #5 · answered by Jaff 4 · 0 1

that's a good one

2007-02-27 00:23:42 · answer #6 · answered by Andrew O 3 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers