2007-02-26 15:25:09 · 6 answers · asked by sugar 2 in Travel ➔ Australia ➔ Sydney
For what it's worth, Sydney and San Francisco are actually sister cities. Sister cities are any two cities which have a certain similarity in geography, culture, demographics, tourism interests etc.
And I tend to agree with that statement. Both Sydney and San Francisco have a rugged natural beauty amidst their cosmopolitan and metropolitan landscape (the harbour/bay, the bridge/Golden Gate, Sydney was originally a penal colony/Alcatraz, Sydney is known for celebrating diverse cultures and is San Francisco, Sydney's population grew rapidly during the Victorian era and so did San Francisco's - even though Victorian architecture in respective cities vary greatly).
2007-03-01 00:02:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
San Francisco. Cities defined by water.
2007-02-27 18:13:34 · answer #2 · answered by iansand 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd agree with LA. They're both sprawling cities with a whole lot of different sections and neighborhoods. LA's just a lot bigger and has a worse public transport. But they both have the beach communities, downtown and other surrounding towns.
2007-02-27 01:38:25 · answer #3 · answered by lebenskunstler3 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
During the Sydney mardi gras its probably San Francisco, as there will be almost as many fairies!
2007-02-27 06:29:22 · answer #4 · answered by Ranjeeh D 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
heh, I would say LA, but I live in Melbourne, Australia so I might be biased ;)
Sydney is very Cali though.
2007-02-26 23:29:19 · answer #5 · answered by darklydrawl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i hav 2 say san fransisco!
2007-02-28 13:23:43 · answer #6 · answered by apricot 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋