English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

according to Hillery he has a "rovian mind machine" that compromised her independent sources....

“How was I suppose to know that all my independent sources that I carefully consulted with and those during my husband’s administration had been evilly influenced by the Rovian Mind Control Rays?”

2007-02-26 15:37:58 · answer #1 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 0 0

Your oftentimes used top-wing speaking factor is: "Democrats have been given the comparable intelligence and reached the comparable end, so blaming Bush for deceptive us of a of america is in basic terms political." Then there is using costs with reference to the possibility posed by Saddam that seems to be from bill Clinton, John Kerry or another Democrat. the tip is that if Bush grow to be mendacity, they ought to have been mendacity too. there's a pretend assumption underlying this argument, specifically that Dems gained the comparable intel as Bush (they did no longer), yet putting that aside, listed here are 2 explanation why this may well be a straw guy: (a) the difficulty isn't no rely if human beings believed Saddam had WMD (many did), or no rely if there grow to be any info that he had WMD (there grow to be), it extremely is the undeniable fact that Bush and his administration made an absolute, unconditional case with the info to hand, brooking no dissent and brushing off doubters interior and outdoors the government as cowardly or treasonous. that's what "manipulating the intelligence" and "deceptive the popular public" refers to--the understanding exaggeration of the case for conflict (no rely if by cherry-determining on intel or using defunct intel or by speaking approximately ambiguous intel in alarming absolutes). There we've been, greater desirable than a decade after the 1st gulf conflict, 2 years after 9/11, and Saddam hadn’t attacked us, he hadn’t threatened to attack us. after which all of sudden, he grow to be the biggest possibility to us of a of america--achievable that required a great invasion. a larger possibility than Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Iran, Bin laden. a extensive, instantaneous possibility. It in basic terms defied perception. (b) as nicely to the phobia-mongering defined above, the opposition that Bush 'misled' the popular public isn't in basic terms approximately Saddam's WMD, yet with reference to the way the administration stormed forward with their plans and invaded Iraq interior the way they did, on the time they did, with the Pollyannaish visions they fed the international, all collectively as demonizing dissent and smearing their critics. In the two (a) and (b), the crux of the difficulty is proportionality. no rely if or no longer bill Clinton or France or the U.N. believed Saddam grow to be achievable, the administration's apocalyptic phrases and drastic movements (preemptively invading a sovereign u . s . a .) have been decidedly out of share to the point and immediacy of the possibility. it extremely is the real difficulty.

2016-11-26 01:21:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Slurpy Machine

2007-02-26 15:08:57 · answer #3 · answered by Amish Rebel 4 · 0 1

The Way Back machine. to fix the election! It's true! I repaired it for him

2007-02-26 15:15:46 · answer #4 · answered by Boston Mark 5 · 0 0

He has a weather machine? Maybe he can use it to make snow after he dies. Where he's going it will come in handy.

2007-02-26 15:13:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Can you please tell me what the Bush weather machine is. I'm new to Yahoo! Answers.

2007-02-26 15:15:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Fool 'em All Machine- Crank that baby up- and convince a hundreds of congressmen and senators - and the world of some crap about WMDs.

2007-02-26 15:09:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

He has a machine for everything NEB!

2007-02-26 15:17:29 · answer #8 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 0 0

The idiot republican propaganda machine that my English teacher keeps spewing

2007-02-26 15:16:14 · answer #9 · answered by Giliathriel 4 · 0 0

His famous Weed-Whacker.

Go big Red Go

2007-02-26 15:14:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers