English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1.Why did the thirteen British colonies in America become known as "states"?
2.What system of government divides power among different levels rather than giving all power to a central government?
3. Describe three kinds of nonstate groups that ifulence national politics.
4. How is a direct democracy different from a representative democracy?
5. What is the role of government in a laisser-faire economic system?

2007-02-26 14:40:41 · 4 answers · asked by Karma is Universal 1 in Politics & Government Government

4 answers

1. The early Americans divided the territories into states;
2. Separation of Powers is the term for giving the executive branch, Legislature and Judiciary as co-equals;
3. The Church, Labor Sector and Business Sector affects politics;
4. Direct democracy requires the people to elect the leaders while the representative democracy let the people elect their leaders by state and these elected officials represent them in the national government;
5. The government just supervises business that is operated by the people.

2007-02-26 14:53:53 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 1

1 & 2. In 1776, the 13 colonies declared independence from Great Britain and formed the United States, the world's first constitutional and democratic federal republic.

3.
A. Terrorists groups
B. Religious groups by denomination. IE, the influence of the Vatican.
C. Organized Crime Syndicates

4. A Direct Democracy is a pure democracy in that it comprises a form of democracy and theory of civics wherein sovereignty is lodged in the assembly of all citizens who choose to participate.

A Republic doesn't represent all the ppl but rather, the majority of each district through the elected official by that majority to represent them.

5. means that the neoclassical school of economic thought holds a pure or economically liberal market view: that the free market is best left to its own devices, and that it will dispense with inefficiencies in a more deliberate and quick manner than any legislating body could. The basic idea is that less government interference in private economic decisions such as pricing, production, consumption, and distribution of goods and services makes for a better (more efficient) economy.

2007-02-27 09:41:57 · answer #2 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0 0

basically like voters of the different united states of america, distinctive human beings have distinctive evaluations in spite of what the opinion of their leaders is. for my area, I disagree with what our united states of america's doing in Afghanistan and Iraq. besides the incontrovertible fact that i does no longer say that Israelis are bloodthirsty terrorists because's basically as undesirable as individuals calling everybody residing in Iraq or Afghanistan a bloodthirsty terrorist.

2016-09-29 23:17:00 · answer #3 · answered by carol 4 · 0 0

I like your name.

You should really do your own homework. Read the text in your book, if you don't have your book - research the info yourself.

2007-02-26 14:44:00 · answer #4 · answered by totalstressor 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers