2007-02-26 14:36:14 · 12 answers · asked by Twyla 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Neutral in the moral and ethical sense. That's all based on human interpretation.
2007-02-26 15:26:28 · answer #1 · answered by Giliathriel 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Perception is just another fad word that has become popular for the purpose of dishonesty to appear to have a sense of power.
In reality there is no such thing given the fact that lip service cannot change obvious events/facts. If someone perceived and verbalized fire isn't hot how many people would stick their hands in it? With perception comes words and no all facts are not up for grabs dead is dead, burnt is burnt, dishonesty is dishonesty and that's a fact.
Perception - when verbalized is cut and dry ...a lie or the truth. Is truth really up for grabs? Today many think so but then there they go again perceiving themselves as powerful.
2007-02-27 20:18:08 · answer #2 · answered by GoodQuestion 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are man. Human perception cannot helped but be learned over time and there is no escaping it. It is what makes it unique to man. Therefore since this characteristic is intrinsic in our species, all events will never be free of neutrality.
2007-02-26 17:34:36 · answer #3 · answered by Uncle Remus 54 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Given that neutrality is a perception of humans in itself, no.
2007-02-26 17:41:28 · answer #4 · answered by eschampion 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, humans do not create activity in events just by perceiving them. The events are just there. They are positive or negative, or neutral all on their own. It's like does a tree falling in the forest make a noise if no one is there to hear it? It still makes noise, but its just not heard.
2007-02-26 15:19:56 · answer #5 · answered by tklines 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmmm. interesting question. number one issue --yes, perception is reality. reality at least to ourselves. now hold on to this view and read, see, experience more -- all with your five senses and you will be able to change that "perception" and sometimes the reality that you see. PS. a humorous example will shed some light into your thinking. two very hungry lads -- suddenly were blessed with a baker's gift of a loaf of fresh bread. one of them stated -- hold on, let's not eat these "2 loaves" -- as we have a real one in front of us, and the other one in our minds! no need to tell you -- one of the lads ate the whole loaf of bread in the absence of his friend -- and his answer was that the other lad could still enjoy the second loaf! all by himself. Hope you see, what I mean.
2007-02-26 14:47:06 · answer #6 · answered by s t 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. there is a moral law and an ethical view point as a law in creation like gravity and is not existant because of human perception. there is a right and a wrong -even if there be no mankind
2007-02-26 14:46:26 · answer #7 · answered by Caridad 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree strongly with caridad, who said that there is a moral right and wrong that is not dependent on human perception.
2007-02-26 15:30:18 · answer #8 · answered by Bob T 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in essence they are all neutral, but charged and balanced by human beliefs and judgment ...Yes, BALANCED. Without balance nothing would exist...well, illnesses balanced too, just confirming their existence as well as existence of ill events.
2007-02-26 17:22:49 · answer #9 · answered by Oleg B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends who you're asking. Humans do, however, as a group, tend to believe that the universe revolves around them. Morons.
2007-02-26 15:01:49 · answer #10 · answered by kipster968 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋