running out of questions aint ya?
2007-02-26 14:20:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
In some instances, yes. However, in general less is less and more is more. There's just no meeting of the two.
2007-02-26 22:20:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by JADE 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
depends on what you are talking about. In magazine advertising the ads with less crap on them are more noticed so in that case less is more. If you buy cheap stuff you get more for less. In art it is called Minimalism describes movements in various forms of art and design, especially visual art and music, where the work is stripped down to its most fundamental features and core self expression. In other fields of art it has been used to describe the plays of Samuel Beckett, the films of Robert Bresson, the editing and stories of Gordon Lish and the stories of Raymond Carver, and even the automobile designs of Colin Chapman.
As a specific movement in the arts it is identified with developments in post-World War II Western Art, most strongly with the visual arts. The term has expanded to encompass a movement in music which features repetition and iteration, for example the music of Steve Reich, Philip Glass, John Adams, and Terry Riley. (See also Post-Minimalism). It is rooted in the spare aspects of Modernism, and is often associated with Postmodernism and reaction against Expressionism in both painting and composition. Generally, Pop art and Minimalism are considered to be the last Modern art movements and thus the precursors to Contemporary art or Postmodern art.
The term "minimalist" can also refer to anything which is spare, stripped to its essentials, or providing only the outline of structure, independent of the particular art movement, and "minimalism" the tendency to reduce to fundamentals. It is sometimes applied to groups or individuals practicing asceticism and the reduction of physical possessions and needs to a minimum.
so to answer your question less is more
2007-02-26 22:26:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by ♫Rock'n'Rob♫ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, because sometimes less is so much more!
2007-02-26 22:21:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by happy_southernlady 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes on certain things like less cramps, less perfume and the list goes on.
2007-02-26 22:21:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Emery 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
more or less.
lol, no less is always less, more is always more. Whether or not more is better depends on more what. More money to you is always better, more paid out is not.
2007-02-26 22:22:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by tootall1121 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, but less seems to cost more now.
2007-02-26 22:21:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jungleroy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
More is less.
2007-02-26 22:19:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by kristen 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Girls with less clothing get more attention
2007-02-26 22:22:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dalton K 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, more or less.
2007-02-26 22:20:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
more or less
2007-02-26 22:20:17
·
answer #11
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
0⤋