should they be called traitors. That they dont know what htey are talking about?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070227/us_nm/iraq_usa_poll_dc_1;_ylt=Ass3XQq0N.QBAhnmTkOxcrRX6GMA
2007-02-26 14:08:07 · 4 answers · asked by paul 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
i am sure the republican will think that, since they only sit at home nice and safe while these people were there.
2007-02-26 14:13:12 · answer #1 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you agree that we should withdraw our troops before the job is finished - then, of course, you are a "cut and runner."
The ABC/Washington Post poll was a telephone poll - perhaps the liberals had the free time to answer this poll in a much larger percentage than the conservatives - who were at work.
2007-02-26 22:19:18 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
After continuous bad news reported from Iraq and the exaggerated comments from those making their run at higher office what do you expect? The attitude of the country reflects the news they receive. How do people think about the issue if all they get are the negative reports from Iraq?
Remember, the loudest screaming about the war is coming from those who voted to go to war (Hillary Clinton?) Was she dumb or is she hypocritical?
2007-02-26 22:14:48 · answer #3 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I do not think they are traitors they are entitled to their own opinion it is just too bad they are wrong.
2007-02-26 22:14:21 · answer #4 · answered by Pat B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋