English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I was looking at a guy's comment on a new one in the works.. Ive known that since long before 3 came out.

But everytime someone mentions 3 its usauly in a bad way.

What do you not like about 3? we knew it would happen. not like the story line was a surprise.

same thing as Ep 3 of Star Wars.

2007-02-26 13:14:17 · 3 answers · asked by clomtancy 5 in Entertainment & Music Movies

3 answers

No Edward Furlong. =(

2007-02-26 13:18:20 · answer #1 · answered by ღღღ 7 · 0 1

1. Cyberdine went down in movie 2 so where did the chips for the robots come from for the T1's

2. They killed John Connor and his wife sent back yet another terminator, why? Why did they wait so long? Why didn't they send them all at once? And what happened to the line in movie one about blowing the machine up?

3. And what about the line in movie one that the time machine only works on fleshy beings? The T2000 and the TX are polymetal alloy, not flesh.

4. If there was a TX why wasn't it sent back to the same date as in the first movie?


In short there are so many disagreements between t3 and t1 it is obscene.

2007-02-28 18:10:52 · answer #2 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 0 0

But there is a difference. There are parts of star wars that were GOOD. Its not like i felt any intensity in T3. They should have based it in the future. And I didnt like that john connor was played by a different actor, and that sarah connor was dead.

2007-02-26 13:18:43 · answer #3 · answered by vanman8u 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers