We must continue to maintain a constant vigil against terrorist worldwide. On the BBC Radio 4 News this morning, they were discussing the smuggling of uranium from an old mine in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The Brits believe this uranium may already have found itself into the hands of terrorists and some certainly has gone to Iran.
From a British point of view, no matter which political party is in power in UK, Labour or Conservative, the fight against terror will continue. We must continue to be aggressive in our actions against terrorists and kill them on their home ground. To this end the Brits will step up actions they are taking against the Taliban in Afghanistan. A major Spring offencive against the Taliban is expected.
Watch this space.
2007-02-26 18:22:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's not greater than 80% - no way. But he does continue to enjoy strong support, because voters there look at the US like shareholders at a company - in terms of an economy of specific corporate interests. Because he is good to these corporations, they- and hence the national economy is enjoying a time of healthy strength, they believe.
This plus the fact that voters do not take foreign policy decisions into account unless there is a feeling that other nations are walking all over us, which there isn't with firm man Bush - they just go with gut feelings of 'this feels like a man I can trust', and their views are influenced by his massive & well funded election campaign marketing efforts.
2007-02-26 21:03:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Wise Kai 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Great, here we have another member of the brainwashed masses. Of course, I use the word "brain" in it's broadest sense of the word...
Where did you get that statistic? President Bush is the least popular US president of all time. He is the first president who will take advantage of the "lifetime bodyguard" option after he leaves presidency. Do you really think that this is because people love him?
What right do you have to call these people barbarians? Why do you think they're medieval? Just because they don't live the same lifestyle and their culture is different to yours does NOT give you the right to impose your "culture" on them. That is the most classless, base, tactless thing I have EVER heard.
What is the war about if it's not about oil? Were there any weapons of mass destruction?
Who started the war? Not them I can tell you that for damn sure.
2007-02-26 13:30:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by greenfan109 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Am I the only one lacking the vast image right here? Hitler replace right into a paranoid schizophrenic who had hundreds of thousands of Jews, gypsies and homosexuals slaughtered for no different reason than they have been basic objectives. no remember what you think of of his rules, conversing skill, or character, you are able to not extremely examine President Bush to Chancellor Hitler. Do you extremely desire to comprehend what historians will say an prolonged time from now? right here is the respond. Hitler will stay an infamous character, and books approximately him will continuously be got here across on the low value rack at super bookstores. Bush would be all yet forgotten, and books written approximately him will in basic terms be got here across as mandatory analyzing on the college point.
2016-10-16 13:50:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Infact there is not much ideological or religious issues involved.The issues are more or less economic.Substantial portion of oil resources are with Muslim countries.OPEC decisions have much effect on world economy.Oil is not going to last for ever.The fight is to get contol over the large oil resources with Muslim countries.The intervention in Iraq was to take over oil fields.Saddam was only an excuse.If the intervention is to eleminate terrorism why they do not intervene Muslim countries like Bangladesh where there is no oil but there are terrorists?Since British people/economy survives on the mercy of Bush and USA there is strong reason to like and support Bush.
2007-02-26 20:24:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by leowin1948 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The British don't have to contend with the naysayers we do and I doubt they care one whit what the Hollywood bunch thinks. Who else would whine about conserving oil but have 2 or 3 homes scattered around the country and some of them spread 2-3 stories tall over acres and acres and fly from one to the other in private planes but the Hollywoodites? Who all took limos to the Oscars? You'd think Al Gore would have mentioned that!
2007-02-26 13:28:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Anyone who thinks he is intelligent enough to be President of ANY country let alone the United States is living in cloud cuckoo land. A recent survey found him to be the MOST DANGEROUS man in the world.
80%?? it's more like 100%
2007-02-26 13:27:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by M J 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think the survey was that 80% of british like bush, not george bush - we all love bush other than the sausage jockeys and uphill gardeners.
2007-02-26 13:15:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by BUNGLE!! 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
I can't follow this, lord knows what the actual question is. Bush baby is a harmless old dodderer.
2007-02-26 13:20:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
A startling statistic and no doubt plucked from the air like the rest of your incisive bombast. Grow up mentally.
2007-02-26 13:14:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Harriet 5
·
3⤊
2⤋