ok i will try this again since my last question about bush was deleted by the yahoo bush loving club. here i go, now all but the most die hard denial suffering conservative right wings have to admit that george's little "WAR ON TERRORISM" debacle is a complete rouge and failure. so now will you flag waving hypocrites finally admit that those of us that saw the writing on the wall years were not terrorist sympathizers or liberal weenees are you so labeled us!! right??? or do you still think that the boycott of the dixie chicks was the american thing to do because they too disagreed with your king george's unrealistic world view. face it people you were all manipulated by fear and ignorance and you shouldnt be mad at me, but those that played you like a grand piano. so will you be man/woman enought to admit it or will you resort to your childish name calling as you have for the last 4 ignorant years????????oh by the way i am a retired naval officer that served in the mid east. LT. CMDR
2007-02-26 12:41:56 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
what does LT CMDR stand for?
2007-02-26 14:16:33 · answer #1 · answered by elliott 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I just spent a few minutes reading some of your previous questions you've posted. There is not one one thing that leads me to believe that you are a retired naval officer. Judging by your sophomoric jargon, I'm guessing you just want to score points by impersonating a naval officer, Naval officers can make a point with out using junior high language like " weenees" or " ignorant". Where , oh CMDR, did you serve in the Middle East? What dates ??? That should be easy to archive,
2007-02-26 21:55:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
As a native and still a Texan-"Dixie Chicks rock"
You are dead on but use too much verbosity.(LOL)
You know whos' attention span isn't that great.
Take Rush's cue and speak short and quick.
Yes, I wanted Kerry in there to help stop the war but the sheeple won.
You know, to vote against Bush is treason at a time of war and you are labeled ungodly and a terrorist.
First time the USA has ever invaded a nation without clear provocation. 911 terrorists as you know were mainly Saudi, zero Iraqi. But "Dubya" wanted to get the man that "tried to kill my daddy". He has. Now what, Bush?
2007-02-26 21:04:18 · answer #3 · answered by mike h 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I hear you. I was there, too - Army Officer. I feel lied to, cheated, and manipulated all for the profit of private companies that couldn't care less about me or my Soldier's lives. When you see that the US government pays $102K per year to the family of a contractor killed in Iraq and only $40 to that of a fallen Soldier, your BS meter starts to peg.
2007-02-26 21:19:15 · answer #4 · answered by Garth Rocket 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
First of all this is all rant and no question to be found,second of all I really doubt you are retired from any of our branches just by reading what you spew and I figure you probably are very young or a very immature adult (aka radical leftie)
I sense your happiness that things are tough for my country and can almost hear a cheer for Alqaeda...Bravo junior you are an inspiration to all libs/lefties/socialists and communists throughout the world .Yo are a clear example of leftist thinking and lying (LT CMDR hahaha) People like you have brought me to understand why libs support abortion....
2007-02-26 20:56:11 · answer #5 · answered by pepe32 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I'm proud to say that I wasn't sucked in. Unfortuantely our elected representatives couldn't see that this was a fear driven campaign to accomplish something that Dubya had in mind before he was even elected. If the Dems had had any courage at all, they could ave stopped it, but they didn't. So there's plenty of blame to go around.
2007-02-26 22:11:23 · answer #6 · answered by Charlie S 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Im liking what you have to say. Our consent for an illegal war was manufactured through fear and manipulation. It certainly helped that we had a nation full of fat, lazy and obedient TV addicts who bleat like sheep when a president tells them their rights will be violated for their own good. "Baaaaa! Bush will save us!!! Baaaaa" Here here for calling the truth!
2007-02-26 20:53:05 · answer #7 · answered by prancingmonkey 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
They'll never admit it. They'd rather listen to Limbaugh and get some wildly out of control spin excuse to pin it on liberals.
2007-02-26 20:56:44 · answer #8 · answered by ArgleBargleWoogleBoo 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Hooah Commander! Wrong place to try to enlighten. There are none so blind as he who will not see.
2007-02-26 21:06:03 · answer #9 · answered by aiminhigh24u2 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
CORRECT!!
Now watch them deflect by changing the topic and criticizing you for something else.
But, I warn you, they will not change at all - they are similar to the Stepford Wives.
2007-02-26 20:56:41 · answer #10 · answered by Succubus 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋