2007-02-26 11:39:07 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Am0X_H20JMK3SoxPeqpom__sy6IX?qid=20070225120545AA5ZQHU
2007-02-26 11:40:15 · update #1
Wow I have bnever seen the babysitter have to pay so much money for their job! Looks like Iraq is the one babysitting, keep all the troops in our country so we can attack theirs. So who is smarter? Not Bush!
2007-02-26 11:42:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, you have installed a puppet regime w. very little popular support. You set out to 'win' control of the oil market as George senior did giving us cheap oil through the 90's but different (even greedier) people were controlling his son. Now it looks as though you're going to try and play Iraq and Iran off against each other hoping we won't notice you losing Iraq while Iran and the whole Middle East become a much bigger danger.
2007-02-26 19:47:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When we invaded Baghdad so quickly that was considered a win. However, now we have a problem with all the sectarian violence. Its not like one army vs. our army, like the civil war that was won on a battlefied, this is guerrila warfare where we have all these groups fighting with us. Just imagine the US army try to fight all the gang bangers in Compton. How do you know who to shoot at and who are the innocent civilians.
2007-02-26 19:48:28 · answer #3 · answered by Smitha 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely correct! I have said this over and over to my friends but they keep talking about winning. We won the war and now let's go home. Let the Iraqis reboot and start from scratch. This is only wishful thinking because the Sunnis and Shiites have been at it for centuries.....and we are going to stop them from fighting and killing one another? Bull.
2007-02-27 03:32:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on your definition of winning. I think the Bush administration more so wants to abolish terrorism period (which is impossible), not just reduce the threat. We're fighting a war for complete dominations sake it seems.
2007-02-26 19:43:35 · answer #5 · answered by ApplesOrangesSpheres 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yep, I saw Saddam hung and that's the reason we went there. Yea we might be baby sitting but isn't the lives of the Iraqi people wrth it?
2007-02-26 20:00:06 · answer #6 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We won the 1st phase. The 2nd phase is a lot more difficult.
2007-02-27 21:10:40 · answer #7 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all we never won. We came over there for the oil and thats it. There a bunch of other countries we could be doing this to.
2007-02-26 19:47:26 · answer #8 · answered by jakekn13 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think it will be considered a success when the Iraqi govt can protect its own people. Even though is seems that they are trying to kill each other and if their are any US soldiers nearby then so be it.
2007-02-26 19:42:39 · answer #9 · answered by Johnny Conservative 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Amen brother...........Do we really have to rebuild a country complete with cable TV,heated pools,internet and McDonalds
2007-02-26 19:49:08 · answer #10 · answered by Enigma 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋