2007-02-26 10:41:54 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
If one in the bush is someone's Cheyney in the Bush, that's better.
2007-02-26 10:49:43 · answer #1 · answered by zeroartmac 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Unless you got it backwards on purpose, the quote is "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" and it means that a sure thing is better than a chance at a better thing that might not work out (it comes from back when people would catch their own dinners, get it?)
If you did get it wrong on purpose, well - I like the person who asked if they can have all three . . .
2007-02-26 18:51:28 · answer #2 · answered by tigglys 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Two hands in the bush is much more impressive
2007-02-26 18:45:31 · answer #3 · answered by all_roads_lead_home 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would like one in the bush, two in my hand would just get messy...
2007-02-26 18:52:07 · answer #4 · answered by monkeymanelvis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Keep your hands off my bush.
2007-02-26 18:50:08 · answer #5 · answered by evildragon1952 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I see what you did there!
2007-02-26 18:50:12 · answer #6 · answered by surroundedbyimbeciles 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Whats the differnce between a cop with a speed gun and going down on a woman???
When you go down on a woman you can see the c, u, nt behind the bush
lol
2007-02-26 18:55:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
depends on the size of the bush!!
2007-02-26 18:45:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nice try but that one has already been done by Whoopee Goldberg.
2007-03-02 14:52:49 · answer #9 · answered by H.C.Will 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I DONT KNOW BUT ONE IN THE GRAVE IS WORTH A LOT OF IRAQI LIVES, AMERICAN SOLDIERS LIVES, AFGANI LIVES . I COULD GO ON BUT I THINK YOU GET THE POINT.GOOD AUL GEORGE
2007-02-26 18:55:53 · answer #10 · answered by MR T M 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋