2007-02-26 10:34:47 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
so who is the better younger champ brock or randy?
2007-02-26 10:38:28 · update #1
i believe so. yes
2007-02-26 10:38:01 · answer #1 · answered by under his feathers 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not sure, depending on under what circumstances you would like to see it happen.....
1. Randy Orton gets rewarded for his excellent in-ring and mic work, in addition to playing his part to the "T". This would definitely have Vince write a script up to have Randy win the title.
2. No other qualified wrestlers would have a successful "reign" as champion based upon past and present performance at PPV's, House Shows and Broadcast Live Shows. Randy probably proved himself as a hard worker and played "ball" with the WWE to earn the title.
3. This win probably did not have anything to do with Brock Lesnar because Brock is no longer on the WWE's payroll. Jake the Snake could come back and win it as the oldest champion and it still would not matter. Once you leave the WWE, you don't matter unless you did not burn bridges and there possibly could be a script or storyline that may include you in the future.
2007-02-26 18:43:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Brock was 25, was then the youngest WWE Champion ever (as of 2007, he is still technically the youngest WWE Champion ever, but Randy Orton is the youngest world champion in WWE history, having won the World Heavyweight Championship at 24).
2007-02-26 18:41:33 · answer #3 · answered by crazziegrl14 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely if brock lesnar did not sell out to leave the wwe he would still be the youngest. But brock lesnar is way better then randy orton he is way stronger then him but brock lesnar is even tougher because he does ultimate fighting right now he has heart to fight people with no script added at all.
2007-02-26 18:36:35 · answer #4 · answered by Tim 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brock's still the youngest. Orton was the world heavyweight champion, not the WWE champion.
2007-02-26 18:47:59 · answer #5 · answered by almighty_malachi 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Brock was much better. He left WWE and that didn't make McMahon happy at all
2007-02-26 19:05:40 · answer #6 · answered by k 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Certainly, now who's better? Probably Randy Orton because he was smart enough to still be wrestling
2007-03-02 17:36:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes... Lesnar left the WWE and McMahon wasn't happy about it.
2007-02-26 18:39:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they did it as a way to get the belt back to Triple H. Since RKO did not hold the belt that long
2007-02-26 19:37:18 · answer #9 · answered by Matt 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah i guess but randy deserved it and brock didnt
2007-02-26 18:38:01 · answer #10 · answered by WILD 4 RKO 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
yes
2007-02-26 18:36:59 · answer #11 · answered by Mrs. Priss 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋