2007-02-26 10:03:17 · 8 answers · asked by WM C K 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
If "clean or green" energy was available in Nashville, there would be no need to ration kilowatt hours. Such energy is available where I live ( Oregon).
Al Gore claims to live energy neutral. I see no reason to doubt this claim. Gore has always been honest and straight forward.
2007-02-26 10:22:36 · answer #1 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. And neither would Bush or Cheney, but that's not the point. The point is that Gore is the one who stood up on (inter)national television and congratulated the entertainment industry on a "green" Oscar show. The same industry that accounts for over 20% of the air pollution in the LA area because they refuse to convert their production vehicles to cleaner fuels. The point isn't who is more wasteful, it's who is pretending not to be.
2007-02-26 18:15:57 · answer #2 · answered by Dr. M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A better question would be, if Bush/Cheney enacted the policies Gore proposes, how much cleaner would the air get?
But, the answer is probably no. Gore does not push for rationing. He pushes for a zero carbon footprint policy.
2007-02-26 18:13:42 · answer #3 · answered by Matthew P 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why pick on Gore ? How about Cheney's and Bush's Homes ?
2007-02-26 18:09:04 · answer #4 · answered by Vinegar Taster 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but al gore wants global warming because he would be out of a job without it.
2007-02-26 18:06:47 · answer #5 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Gore honest?? How do you know when a politician is lying. His lips are moving. And he invented the Internet. Have you seen his non-science fiction movie?
2007-02-26 19:00:35 · answer #6 · answered by taurushead 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
your great-grandchildren will be very grateful to people like Al Gore
2007-02-26 18:08:14 · answer #7 · answered by epbr123 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
That sounds suspiciously socialist of you.
2007-02-26 18:06:22 · answer #8 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋