English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Are both believeable or unbelieveble? In Gore you trust?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling

2007-02-26 09:52:22 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

Believe it or not, science has come along a little since the 70's. Nice try though.

2007-02-26 09:57:38 · answer #1 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 0 0

It doesn't matter to the left. They don't care that we're treated to new scares by environmentalists every decade. We've had Global cooling, acid rain, ozone hole, and now Global Warming. Give it another couple years and they'll start complaining about some other global disaster in the making that can only be solved by eliminating Capitalism.

2007-02-26 09:57:41 · answer #2 · answered by VoodooPunk 4 · 0 0

Denying global warming is, to me, is no different than holocaust denial. Back in the 70's we discovered that the use of aerosol cans had a detrimental effect on the atmosphere. So does the exhaust of internal combustion engines as well as numerous other products, all of which have been attacked over the years and improved on. The result of all these discoveries is that we alter the products we use so that we don't destroy the planet. Don't ever kill the messenger, they may be trying to save your life.

2007-02-26 10:15:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

All I know is that the answer to the questions of whether or not global warming is:

a) A threat to human existance.
b) Exacerbated by human activity

will not be found through the ignorant rhetorical rantings of cheesy poof stuffed, Rush Limbaugh listening, dodo birds.

2007-02-26 09:58:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

loads of those claims, and claims comparable, are made by utilising human beings that're the two fearful of the actuality, or who opt for to cajole human beings it would not exist for employer reasons (i.e. oil agencies, etc). of path you do get a small share of human beings who don't have self assurance in it because of the fact they do no longer discover it logical or do no longer see the sense in it yet returned, this is an particularly small share! i individually have self assurance in it. rapidly forward answer: sure they could returned up a number of them yet no longer practically adequate to coach it incorrect. right that's a itemizing of what's sponsored up and what isn't: • the present warming is brought about by utilising organic cycles - NO • worldwide warming has ended and the Earth has been cooling for X form of years - NO • Scientists have admitted that they invented worldwide warming, fabricated the info etc - NO • worldwide warming has no longer brought about any replace in the climate – droughts, floods, hurricanes etc - NO • worldwide warming is brought about by utilising the city warmth island consequence, floor stations are incorrectly sited etc - in all hazard yet no longer likely • Scientists have deleted the uncooked documents, the artwork of scientists can’t be demonstrated - NO • It’s warmed quicker in the previous - in all hazard and specific • The form of glaciers is becoming, glaciers are increasing etc - NO • Volcanoes emit extra CO2 then human beings do - NO (There are around 6.8 Billion human beings in the international and not practically adequate volcanoes. • each and all of the laptop fashions in the previous have been incorrect - NO • the different planets are warming consequently it’s the sunlight - NO universal those "worldwide warming skeptics" can't returned up their claims.

2016-10-02 01:10:14 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Some "scientists" will say anything to keep getting their funding. Politicians (like Gore) will repeat what those "scientists" say in order to feed their aganda. An amateur geologist can dig a hole and show you different hues in the soil and rocks that show warming and cooling trends of the Earth over millions of years.

2007-02-26 10:11:31 · answer #6 · answered by sepp55774 2 · 0 0

I personally believe in Global Cooling. Al Gore admitting he exaggerated on his film didn't help much.

2007-02-26 09:56:33 · answer #7 · answered by Sarcasm Queen 3 · 0 0

It's wonderful that people have memory.

I'm glad to see people have started waking up and thinking 'hey, whats the deal with this? This doesn't add up'

You have to research and learn for yourself, then decide what you believe.

2007-02-26 10:00:46 · answer #8 · answered by p_rutherford2003 5 · 0 0

Great point, it goes to show that people just think politically instead of with science.

THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF THAT GLOBAL WARMING IS MAN MADE.

2007-02-26 10:04:12 · answer #9 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 0 1

i always heard of global warming,,never cooling,,it sure seems it is really warming slowly

2007-03-02 09:42:37 · answer #10 · answered by jerry 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers