English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Gee- I hope the answers don't follow partisan lines.

2007-02-26 08:54:31 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

um- this obviusly depends whether or not you are pro-clinton. i personally think B.J. Clinton was a womanizing, oily, hypocrytical rapist, and that his shrew of a wife could break windows with her flip-flopping shreik, but hey, that's just me. so clintonian to would be a negative thing.

2007-02-26 08:59:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

From a political sense..Negative..(The guy became a passive advocate for smoking weed but "not inhaling", and ruined his reputation by engaging in less than wholesome activity) From the sense of where we stand now? Positive. It's easy to talk politics from Home as a war is going on. A President has a vast amount of responsibility, and decisions to make every day that will either make or break him or her. Weigh it Sonny.

2007-02-26 09:06:22 · answer #2 · answered by 35 YEARS OF INTUITION 4 · 1 0

"Clintonian" in the arena of foreign policy would be a policy of appeasement.

"Clintonian" in the domestic policy arena would be a policy of increased spending and large scale unaccountability.

"Clintonian" when refering to economics would refer to ordering federal regulators to allow the stock market to grow using a series of ponzi and pyramid schemes allowing the initial investors to get rich while leaving the stockholders carrying the bag. It is the same plan as Whitewater except it caused a recession once the dot-com bubble burst.

"Clintonian" in politics would refer to holding others to standards you are known to not adhere to or being brutally agressive to not just defeat, but destroy your opponents, even of the same political party. It could also be used to refer to draconian methods of eliminating competitors or those who have knowlege of your malfeasance.

2007-02-26 09:07:51 · answer #3 · answered by Jester 3 · 1 0

Very effective. a modern-day survey said sixty six% of voters trust bill will be an asset to a Hillary administration. bear in thoughts that BC's job approval became virtually two times that of Bush even throughout Monicagate.

2016-12-04 23:56:52 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I think negative unless you are describing one's communication artistry. (He did much better in that area than Bush). "Clintonian" should not be confused with what my lovers have used to describe me - leave the first "n" out.

2007-02-26 09:11:42 · answer #5 · answered by Whootziedude 4 · 1 0

anything having to do with either Clinton would be negative. Clintonion would mean to me ' anything clinton like' which would be abborant.

2007-02-26 09:01:15 · answer #6 · answered by subvet004 1 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers