2007-02-26 08:17:28 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I would much rather be King of the South.
The barbeque, accents, music, literature, culture, and overall level of civilization is much superior to Engand.
Rock and roll, blues, jazz, William Faulkner, Mark Twain, Elvis, John Coltrane, Miles Davis, Martin Luther King, John Nash, Malcolm X, Dolly Parton, Johnny Cash, and too man other late greats to mention are all Southerners, and there is no reason to believe that the region is going to be spent of brilliance any time soon.
Sorry England, you are nice, but I will take the American South any day.
2007-02-26 08:38:32 · answer #1 · answered by jonny c 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Id Rather be king of England then the south just my saying so but the king of England is cool i like high royalty like that..
2007-02-26 16:22:10 · answer #2 · answered by richman062000 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Would not want to be "king of the south, England, or any other country or direction." There is but one KING ... and that is Jesus.
2007-02-26 16:29:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The South. All who support entitlements, socialism, or infringement of their neighbors freedoms will be deported to live in the North or West. Eventually, our chief exports to our repressed and oppressed neighbors would end up being alcohol, tobacco, pot, firearms, gambling, and porn.
2007-02-26 16:40:51 · answer #4 · answered by Michael E 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Tony Blair is King of England until he is succeeded by the second in line, Brown the boring.
2007-02-26 16:21:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
King of England... who has ever heard of Prince of Alabama, unless its about some redneck homopotamus?
2007-02-26 16:21:16 · answer #6 · answered by James J. Wilson 1 · 0⤊ 4⤋
either way...you are a malignant narcissist for thinking about it :)
2007-02-26 16:20:33 · answer #7 · answered by voiceofreason 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋