You are told its a Republic of that utilizes Democracy via election process! Yet no common person can get in office without pandering to big business? Your votes are NOT verifiable with recorded proof! Wouldn't you like to have a direct verifiable say in you families welfare & financial security? When are you willing to organize change? You can NOT rely on VOTING every 2/4/6/8 years.
2007-02-26 07:45:30 · 7 answers · asked by bulabate 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
It is time to start over.We have long none that the rich and elite run this country.They have gutted our constitution to make sure we cant take back control.America lets start over and put common people in office.
2007-02-26 07:57:39 · answer #1 · answered by alx1970499 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I consider you. The conflict in Iraq did not could take place. What i'm ill and bored with is Republicans and conservatives that think of Liberals are cowards because of the fact they're against a trumped up folly of a conflict. I certainly have by no skill met a Liberal that doesn't combat for his u . s . a . if it have been for a in basic terms reason. What i don't understand is why would every person combat for his u . s . a . if the reason being an unjust one. regrettably, our government has manipulated a super sort of people into believing that this would be a in basic terms conflict in Iraq. it is not in basic terms. there is extra homicide, chaos, and destruction in Iraq now then there replace into whilst saddam replace into in skill. this is unhappy. I wander what "dez604" has to assert approximately comments of almost a million ineffective civillians in Iraq because of the fact the conflict began. Or the reality that a minimum of 5 million have left there properties. sort of wounded?? i will not be able to even think of. i contemplate whether "dez604" even cares?
2016-10-16 13:16:23 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, I would like to have complete control over my family's welfare & financial security, and not depend upon the government at all for it. That is why I am completely against Social Security and against government medical programs.
With Social Security, 13% of my wages are taken, with no guarantee of any return. I'd rather have this myself to invest on my own future, because there is no requirement for the government to pay out any social security. So, as it stands, I have to, on my own, save an equal or greater amount in private retirement plans, so I will actually have something to retire on, or have something to leave my family should I die.
Similarly, I pay out a lot for Medicare - which I may not live to get. I'd rather be responsible for my own medical needs.
I would also like to take the opportunity to point out that both of these government schemes are unConstitutional; the government does not have any authority to be doing this, besides its usurpation of states' and citizens' powers.
2007-02-26 07:56:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If it's not in the peoples hands it's in the wrong hands.
2007-02-26 07:51:17 · answer #4 · answered by Ajax 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Eye, eye Captain..
2007-02-26 07:50:19 · answer #5 · answered by leonard bruce 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
OK, so what do you suggest?
2007-02-26 07:49:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
AYE !!
2007-02-26 07:49:36 · answer #7 · answered by Tired Old Man 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋