is it because his children will imitate his doctrine and carry on in his footsteps
2007-02-26 07:20:39 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Well in history the children of tyrannical monarchs were probably killed so they couldn't return some how and ensue the same type of rule as their parents.
2007-02-26 07:27:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sometimes you have to stand up for what is right and if right is fight then so be it. Doesn't matter if it is a kid taking lunch money or Saddam Hussein killing women and children to the tune of about 500,000 at best count. Wrong is wrong. Someone has to fight the good fight. Damn sure isn't going to be the liberals and if it is left to the liberals your descendants if women better get used to wearing a vale and talking to Allah speaking Arabic or die hey its their doctrine not mine according to them those are the only choices
2007-02-26 15:31:48 · answer #2 · answered by Sronce 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The tyrant is killed so his followers will not rally round and try to save him. Many people profit from the rule of a tyrant and they will fight to put him back in charge.
Children? Revenge. You don't want any of the bloodline to claim the throne, or revenge the killing of their father.
2007-02-26 15:24:04 · answer #3 · answered by Uncle John 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In order to get rid of any lineage from that line in the future.
2007-02-26 15:23:43 · answer #4 · answered by Stefbear 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
To avoid vengeance by the heirs.
2007-02-26 15:23:05 · answer #5 · answered by GuyNextDoor 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Fear that the children may re-instate themselves which is compounded by the fear of retaliation.
2007-02-26 15:23:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
because he was KILLING his own people in sick horrible ways. He got the death penalty to stop the murders.
His sons were doing it too!
2007-02-26 15:23:17 · answer #7 · answered by Little Tiger 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋