i am trading mike mussina and adam laroche for roy oswalt and brandon inge
i think this is a very fair trade and should not be vetoed
would you veto it?
2007-02-26 07:18:14 · 14 answers · asked by Alex M 3 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
i don't think its anybody elses place to veto a trade. you should be able to be stupid if you want too lol. i hate that part of yahoo fantasy baseball but other than that its great. i'd say thats a pretty fair trade. your gettin out ahead with oswalt. and it wouldn't be horrible for the other guy either if he needs laroche too help out with some numbers.
2007-02-26 10:44:37 · answer #1 · answered by joethemetaldude 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd try to get oswalt another way, maybe mussina and someone of lesser value for oswalt alone. I don't know how your whole lineup is, but I think that LaRoche will do well for the pirates this year at PNC. Inge isn't really that impressive, yes he hits some homeruns, but he doesn't hit for average. If you look at LaRoche's numbers over the past years he's getting better and better with more homeruns. DEFINITELY GO FOR OSWALT though. If that's the only way the guy is willing to give you Oswalt, i'd say do it. Moose is getting old.
As for vetoing, i doubt anyone will veto it unless it's a private league between your friends. I've never had a trade vetoed in a public league. Good luck!
2007-02-26 15:32:33 · answer #2 · answered by mac 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that Mussina and Laroche would be better than oswalt and inge. I would not veto the trade because it is far enough.
2007-02-26 15:24:34 · answer #3 · answered by chadwick19811981 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Although the person recieving Oswalt and Inge gets a little bit of an advantage, it's not unfair enough to be vetoed.
2007-02-26 16:20:15 · answer #4 · answered by Sixteen and Oh 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
holy crap i would totally veto it because someone is being unfairly played... oswalt is WAY WAY WAY better than Moose and LaRoche cannot even come close to comparing to Inge. I would SO veto it... but if you are getting oswalt and inge you better hope no one does :-D
2007-02-26 15:26:11 · answer #5 · answered by Beast8981 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It seems pretty even. You gain some on pitching and lose a little on hitting.
He gains a 1B hitter and loses some on pitching.
This is a pretty good speculative trade on both sides and even if it doesn't work out on either end I don't think it kill a team.
2007-02-26 15:36:31 · answer #6 · answered by EnormusJ69 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
some would say that laroche is better than inge, but I wouldn't veto it...
2007-02-26 15:22:03 · answer #7 · answered by chut1144 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think who evers gettin oswalt and inge is gettin the better side of the deal but its decently fair.
2007-02-26 17:17:25 · answer #8 · answered by bling bling man 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I wouldn't veto this deal and if you have good owners, they won't either.
2007-02-26 17:46:00 · answer #9 · answered by Tucker C 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It isn't unfair enough for me to veto it.
2007-02-26 17:42:30 · answer #10 · answered by Kevin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋