English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-26 07:17:58 · 14 answers · asked by A 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

14 answers

Government's Patiot Act and laws to invade out privacy whenever they see fit is a compleat restriction of freedom.

2007-02-26 07:26:04 · answer #1 · answered by Carol L 2 · 3 1

After 911 we all went into this frenzy that every building, airport. stadium, and bridge was going to be blown-into the heavens. We were fed fear and more fear from the cheney/bush people just to keep up their ideologue. In a way, it was a present when the twin towers were attached. They knew we would be putty in their hands. Look what they have done to our freedoms. Osama bin Laden has to be rolling on the ground laughing what we have done to ourselves. He might have blown up more buildings but could not have ever put the restrictions of our freedoms on us like we done to ourselves. We Americans are brave and proud people. To abuse our freedoms like our government has, with spending billion of dollars on a lot of programs that was just throwing money away.
I have watched our law enforcement become less interested in the people, but rather it is them verses us. We need to stand up and take back our freedom before it it to late.

2007-02-26 15:52:41 · answer #2 · answered by gwallerius 1 · 0 0

There are many things which restrict our freedom. Being forced to stop at a red light is restriction of freedom. If I have to wait on the side and wait for a machine to wait until it lights up to tell me I can walk is restricting my freedom. When the government breaks its own laws in order to arrest someone is restriction of freedom. The govt is bound to obey its own laws. The govt is grossly stacked in the govts favor and is surely not your friend. There have been several home owners whom have had their homes taken away in order to be given to corporations. That is taking away freedom from the homeowners. Taking away of the right to free speech without spying eyes is unconstitutional. Paying off of witnesses in order for criminals to get lighter sentences so that the govt can only get their main guy is unconstitutional. Taxing without representation is a loss of freedom that can never can never be given back. Taking property away from one citizen and giving it to another is wrong. Silencing a unpopular minority is taking away of freedom.
Being attacked by officers in order to get a conviction before a person has even seen their lawyer is not constitutional. There have been many freedoms that we have lost. Putting scam eras in stop lights is unconstitutional. I can go on and on. I will list my reference below.

2007-02-26 15:49:49 · answer #3 · answered by Don't Know 5 · 0 0

Pretty much any law restricts freedom. Any time a law is passed, no matter how vague or unjust, the government is saying that it will gladly use armed force to ensure your compliance, and they are willing to kill or imprison you if you refuse.

2007-02-26 15:28:33 · answer #4 · answered by Zombie 7 · 3 0

Law and order, by not letting you do what you want, when you want!! I am restricted because I have to pay Tax when I dont actually want to, the law makes me!!

2007-02-26 15:25:03 · answer #5 · answered by SCOTT B 4 · 0 0

A straight jacket - very restrictive!

2007-02-26 15:26:18 · answer #6 · answered by L D 5 · 0 0

It can't be the Yahoo censorship team, they are too funny, what I mean by that is they find it difficult to analyse English humour, so the slap a coz violation on it just in case..okay ya hahahahahahaha

2007-02-26 15:54:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Liberals
By banning such things as use of legal products like smoking, trans fats, cell phones, "hurtful" speech, belief in a God, Christmas, suv's
Or by not doing things like banning child porn, illegal aliens
liberals are anti-American freedoms

2007-02-26 15:23:54 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 4 1

Yahoos policy of determining what a violation is or is not , the arbitrary response in deleting some answers is debatable.


Y FRONTS -Self explanatory.

2007-02-26 15:22:38 · answer #9 · answered by katrinasfather 3 · 3 1

Nothing has restricted my freedom!

2007-02-26 15:22:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers