How could the BBC report that WTC 7 collapsed at 4:57 pm?

Question

when it didn't collapse until 5:20.

In the vid below a reporter is talking about it collapsing and it's still there.

http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=1471985581749234824&hl=en

what the vid. or dont answer. you people are beyond dumb. you can see the building behind the reported while they are talking about it.

it great how you people can make up your minds without even watching the video. thats ok, you are the ones that look dumb.

Answer 1

republicans have no clue, it must be nice living in a fantasy world.

Answer 2

Well, it's clearly one of two things.

(1) The most secretive, complex, ingenious, and devious government conspiracy in the history of the United States, if not the world, was foiled by a conspirator who felt the need to leak a press release to the BBC that one of the detonator-wired buildings was about to implode because he/she couldn't wait that extra 20 minutes to have them, say, actually watch it implode.

OR

(2) A news organization half a globe away trying to make sense of constant stream of confusing and conflicting reports from the United States may have misreported something like "WTC 7 has been evacuated and is about to collapse" through some international game of "Telephone" gone awry on the most hectic day since Pearl Harbor.

You make the call.

Answer 3

It's simple. The mainstream media is run by a bunch of cowardly hacks, who view it as their mission to act as mouthpieces for the government. The owners of the mainstream media are an integral part of the establishment surrounding the Bilderberg Group. As a part of this, information is being fed down the system without anyone critically analyzing the source. Some examples of this are the numerous memo-leaks from Faux News.

Then, due to gross incompetence and probably a good dose of self-interest, these sad pathetic creatures who call themselves 'journalists', just spew out whatever they're being fed and try to look smart while doing it, pack it into big clever words, which is probably the only useful skill they picked up from university.

The fact is, in this particular case, that the BBC reported an unlikely event before it happened, which is a perfect example of them just repeating what they're being fed, without even so much as looking at the building to verify the claims. That is gross incompetence.

How could this source know that the building would collapse? And who is this source, and how far up the system can it be tracked?

Meanwhile, the BBC are refusing to admit that the information came from anywhere at all. They claim it was all a mistake and that the reporter just by chance predicted what would happen 30 min. later, and what the commission report couldn't even explain. That basically makes that news reporter an ORACLE....

....unless they actually were fed that info, which of course they were. As for now they're hiding the source, which makes them willfully part of the conspiracy.

And I know that uninformed people out there won't be able to read anything out of this whole turn of events, but for someone who already knows that building 7 was brought down by demolition, this is just such an obvious expose of the mainstream media propaganda machine in action that it's almost painful to watch. But on the brighter side, this completely removes any shred of doubt I ever had that 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.

There's your proof of foreknowledge. Right there in front of your eyes. Now please, good people. Don't turn this into a republican bashing party. Cheney and his cronies are NOT republicans, they are not conservatives. Know what the word 'conservative' means. The neo-cons are a group of RADICALS, they're not conserving ****.

So please, do not vote for Edwards or Hillary Clinton in 2008 because you hate Bush. They're also a part of the establishment, their campaigns are paid for by big business with agendas, so these people don't work for you. Nor do they think they do.

Vote for republican Ron Paul in 2008. Vote for him even if you're a democrat.

And for the brits: Vote for George Galloway.

Answer 4

they did no longer guess. They have been given the information incorrect. What befell on the date became into momentous and documents readers are no longer the on television encyclopedias you seem to assume. human beings feed them information, the information tale is changing rapid and information can no longer continuously be checked and errors are made. I doubt the information reader had even heard of the call WTC7 or what ever it glided by utilising till now this time and would not be waiting to show it out. then you've comments from the firefighters that they do no longer seem to be scuffling with it and that it could give way. all of it will become chinese language whispers on an particularly frightening and chaotic day. in simple terms seem at information memories as they improve at present. fantastically with the internet you are able to discover stuff crop up that in simple terms isn't real. It has befell till now and it keeps to take place at present and is a actuality of rolling information memories. human beings make errors, handle it.

Answer 5

You see, there was this big conspiracy by the meanie BusHitler to detonate that building, but someone leaked that info to the New York Times which immediately disseminated it to the whole world. The BBC was the first to report on it despite the fact Bush didn't detonate it yet!

Give it a rest. Seriously.

Answer 6

Here are some possibilities:

1) The time for the report is wrong
2) The time zone calculation for the report is wrong
3) The BBC accidentally got it right due to an, initially, wrong report.
4) It's an urban legend.

Answer 7

Elvis told them what was going to happen. They weren't reporting the news, they were "predicting" what was going to happen.

By the way, your link doesn't provide a BBC report...just for the record. That is a third party video.

Interesting...don't you think?

Answer 8

Maybe whoever was doing the reporting made a mistake or had a problem with their watch. Does it really make that much of a difference ?

Answer 9

Because a conspiracy video can say any damn thing its producer wants it to say. It doesn't make it true or false. Do you believe everything you see, hear or read? WHat about an entire downtowm Manhatten? Hundreds of thousands were wrong right??

Answer 10

The BBC had an advance copy of the conspiracy and blow the whole thing by giving the wrong time. They knew that Elvis, Prince Charles and Bush had left the building

Answer 11

The building being pointed to in the video is NOT WTC7.