2007-02-26 06:43:39 · 9 answers · asked by Curt 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
It would be 1 state, all for one and one for all socialism at its best, and nothing getting done anywhere because they would all be waiting for the other guy to do it, so they can get their share of his work!
2007-02-26 06:47:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Liberals and Socialists are not really related! I don't think that in a certain country you can "inflict" major changes from a day to another. In a democracy things take time! Names some times are much more impressive than the "actual" deference in accomplishing things.
2007-02-26 14:55:28 · answer #2 · answered by filip 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
San Francisco
2007-02-26 14:50:40 · answer #3 · answered by ganjaman415 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
We would have 50% income tax rates so we could take care of everyone who is too lazy or uneducated to take care of themselves.
2007-02-26 14:53:48 · answer #4 · answered by Ben H 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
we would have more taxes and more jobs leaving the country and more give me programs going on then the taxpayers can afford we would be in a mess
2007-02-26 15:16:02 · answer #5 · answered by dan m 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Wait until 2008. Then we will. And you will like it. Unless you like war, poor health care, and FoxNews.
2007-02-26 14:57:41 · answer #6 · answered by That's what she said 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Exactly like the former Soviet Union, but without the fuzzy hats...
2007-02-26 14:51:51 · answer #7 · answered by sarge927 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Just look at North Korea.
2007-02-26 14:48:10 · answer #8 · answered by boonietech 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
"State of Fear" - courtesy of the cronies in the complicit media, our world would be in a perpetual state of fear because of one crisis or another to deflect criticism..
2007-02-26 14:51:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋