2007-02-26 06:01:03 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Dumbya never had ANY to trade (honer and integrity).
2007-02-26 07:20:23 · answer #1 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. That's a loaded question.
2. I don't feel Bush has traded in his honor and integrity for anything. He still shoots from the hip just as he did after he won the first election in 2000.
2007-02-26 06:40:12 · answer #2 · answered by Evan S 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
President Bush had money before he was elected - so how did he trade integrity & honor for money he already had. Just because you do not agree with his political views does not give you full rein to attack his character.
2007-02-26 06:13:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
he has money first then he wants to have Honor & Integrity, that is why he is elected as our president! War on terror benefit us and him nothing but security! What I see of this war is that it cost a lot more than it brings back but it offer our children a safe future - it I want best!
2007-02-26 06:33:59 · answer #4 · answered by holyfire 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wow, for once you are not bringing up your conspiracy theory of the Twin Towers and the periodic table!!!
Can you show us what money he is receiving? Can you backup anything you say with any ounce of proof? Or do you just spew out from the mouth?
Some people might actually listen to what you have to say if you give us some sources that you are citing with real proof, not this conspiracy B.S.
2007-02-26 06:33:49 · answer #5 · answered by Vince 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
how are you able to take this guy heavily or maybe admire him whilst he says issues like: "we can arise for terror. we can arise for freedom." —Bush, conversing on the marketing campaign path, Oct. 18, 2004, in Marlton, N.J. "the reality of that remember is, in case you hear heavily, Saddam would nonetheless be in skill if he have been president of the USA, and we’d be lots extra effective off." —Bush on the 2d presidential debate in St. Louis, Oct. 8, 2004. Our enemies are creative and ingenious, and so are we. They by no skill end questioning approximately new procedures to harm our u . s . a . and our human beings, and neither can we. —Bush addressing a set of witnesses on the signing of the protection Appropriations Act for financial 365 days 2005 in Washington, DC on Aug. 4. "See, loose countries do not advance weapons of mass destruction." —So W., does this recommend the U.S. isn't a loose u . s . a .?... source: The Chicago sunlight-circumstances, Oct. 13, 2003 "we could skinny our forests in usa." —Bush, on the evil of forests, Aug. 11, 2003 source: The Arizona Republic, "In Arizona, Bush Touts His theory to skinny Forests," Aug. 12, 2003. every person who will not be able to work out the guy would not have a clue, would not have one the two.
2016-10-16 13:06:22 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There was no trade...he never had any honor and couldn't even find integrity in the dictionary. Money for his friends and greed on his own part for more.
2007-02-26 06:12:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Didn't we already answer this question? Is there really a need for repeating it? I do not agree, but then again, I am not a Bush-basher!
2007-02-26 06:17:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I really don't understand how you could possibly make that assumption. He was rich before, he is rich now, and he's going to be rich. I definitely think he's at the point where any additional money wouldn't matter much.
2007-02-26 06:03:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
He does have honor & Integrity
He refused to put Illegal Mexicans in prison because those Mexicans were related to Alberto Gonzales....they were delivering the drugs to the Bush ranch
those illegal drug dealers will respect his honor and Integrity forever....
2007-02-26 06:05:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋