http://www.infoplease.com/spot/blizzard1.html
Blizzard of 1888
How much CO2 was being pumped into the air during those times? It looks pretty normal weather activity without Al Gore's weather machine.
2007-02-26 05:36:15 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You gave to look at global activity, global weather patterns, global increases in air and water temperature. That's why it's called GLOBAL warming. Anecdotal observations don't give a complete picture.
2007-02-26 05:39:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Al Gore is not a "scientist", nor is he qualified to be able to scientifically interpret scientific data.
He grew up as a very privileged person that went back and forth to his "private school" in a limo. He is a pathetic tool that was groomed to one day be the president. He tried and failed (thank goodness). It is truly sad that the best "job" he can come up with that he is actually qualified to do is that of "celebrity spokes person".
It is not surprising that he "believes" in global warming, or that the "elite liberal Hollywood crowd" also "believes" in global warming. However, these people are actually the biggest offenders of what they say causes global warming, the creation of green house gasses. I can guarantee that most of them NEVER fly public airlines and most have serveral expensive and heavily poluting vehicles. Oh, they may provide a hybrid for their illegal mexican imigrant to drive around in, and separate their garbage into plastic, glass and paper, but not much beyond that.
So I guess being a celebrity spokesperson for this "cause" is appropriate after all.
2007-02-26 05:45:22 · answer #2 · answered by cappi 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Uh - check the bottom of the link;
Other notable blizzards: Armistice Day Storm (November 11–12, 1940), The Great Midwest Blizzard (January 26–27, 1967), Blizzard of 1978 (February 6–7, 1978), Superstorm of 1993—also dubbed the "Storm of the Century" (March 12–13, 1993); Blizzard of 1996 (January 7, 1996).
That shoots that theory in the butt.
2007-02-26 05:40:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I love how all these people who know nothing about Global Warming post questions like this trying to act like they are "debunking" it. The only result is that they make themselves look like ignorant cretins. Way to go!
2007-02-26 05:49:30 · answer #4 · answered by drea376 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Check out "Agenda 21" at the UN.
2007-02-26 05:40:04 · answer #5 · answered by jeb black 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
your looking at incidents, not averages.
whether you believe in global warming or not, your argument is idiotic in this case.
2007-02-26 05:39:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
i wish you people would get a clue before asking thses questions. it's getting old.
2007-02-26 05:45:44 · answer #7 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋