English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The writing is on the wall. This is not a political war. History shows that religion is more dangerous. Yet some believe that if we just come home, It's over. Many blame Bush, Yet attacks have happened against America through the Clinton administration, remember the first attack on the towers? In the days of Reagon. How about the I.R.A. Clear back in the sixties? Yet some wan't to run and hide, Murtha, Pelosi, the list goes on. It is time do do away with politics and think about our children. And the home they can loose. Not to mention their lives. olhip48

2007-02-26 05:27:23 · 11 answers · asked by olhip48 2 in Politics & Government Government

11 answers

Unbelievably, there ARE those who want the U.S.A. to be no more. They're elitists, they are offended by The Constitution under which (supposedly) everyone is equal.

Basically, these people believe they are more entitled to your paycheck than you are. And they believe that they are wiser and more able to spend your hard-earned pay properly than you can. They believe you've made a mess of your family and want to re-create it in their own image.

Liberals crave power. We need to be very careful of people like that.

2007-02-26 05:43:25 · answer #1 · answered by CJohn317 3 · 1 3

Liberals don't want the down fall of America but with concentration camps being built during GWB adminstration, an unjust and unnecessary war, Bin Laden on the loose, the Patriot Act removing liberties, it would seem to me you have it backwards.

Attacks are going to happen in a free society. Did you know that as the Clinton Administration was closing they passed information to the incoming Bush Administration about OBL and that he was planning something? Do you know it was ignored by Bushies? What it was, was not a small attack, throwing rocks or planting a bomb in the Murtha building but a full force attack on the US. Two buildings in NYC, The Pentagon and, The Whitehouse or Capitol are hardly one Oklahoma office building or an attack by some radical group throwing rocks. No one wants to run and hide they point out that the reason for the war is bogus and we shouldn't have been there in the first place.

It is the duty of everyone in a democracy to challange their leaders. It is how we remain free. They are challenging the leadership on an issue they find disagreement with.

"Hermann Goering, Hitler’s Propaganda Minister said; “Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger”.

So believe the propaganda if you like, for now at least, it is still a free country, but do not call those who disagree with the Administration's propaganda unpatriotic, or cowardly.

Now shoulder your gun, get back in your hummer and go take down an Arab or two. Oh, you're not in the military! Why not? Talk is cheap. I served 40 years ago, now it's your turn.

2007-02-26 05:42:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Why would you ask such a silly question. What Liberal has said.. " I want the downfall of America".. Just because some people, no make that a lot of people.. about 70% of the people, do not agree with you or your president, does not mean we want the down fall of our country.

We all love our great country.. what we don't love is a president and regime that is slowly taking us into ruin,. Call this a religious war.. call it anything you want.. fact is it is Bush's war. Concocted out of his desire to make up for daddy. Also to appease some of his oil friends... we all know that. Doesn't matter what spin he puts on it.

Now he has it in his mind that he wants to be remembered as a " great war president".. Why can't he see that far from that, he will be remembered, if spoken of at all.. as the worst president in history.

And when you speak of our children and the homes and lives they can lose????? Try listening to the stats..... see how over 3000 have died already.. does that not concern you?

2007-02-26 05:39:12 · answer #3 · answered by Debra H 7 · 3 2

How long in the previous Republicans will could seek for secure haven in different lands because of the fact the liberals advance whinier and whinier? nutrition stamps are in basic terms approximately pointless is maximum situations. Why is a instructor with medical coverage an enemy of Republicans? maximum instructors do tend to show socialist ideals. Sorry whether it is actual. and end watching Sarah Palin. some distance superb wackos like her do not characterize all republicans. i in my opinion moved to Mexico using state's stupid politics, damaging monetary device and shrinking rights and freedoms.

2016-10-16 13:02:50 · answer #4 · answered by arleta 4 · 0 0

Liberals do not seek the downfall of the US....they just have a different idea on how America should be...not that their idea is wrong, it is just different than that of a conservative......both have their good points and both have some serious flaws.

2007-02-26 06:40:23 · answer #5 · answered by kerfitz 6 · 1 0

Why do conservaties seek to generalize liberals through false accusations? Yes, there were attacks during the Clinton adminstration. What's your point? Clinton didn't go off and attack a nation that wasn't involved and he did retaliate...the CORRECT enemy. And, we don't want to see an American downfall, that's just neo con rhetoric to guilt us into feelings that we may be wrong. It's as simple as just wanting the troops home to stop fighting a baseless war that will not be resolved. Why is that so hard to get through your heads?

2007-02-26 05:32:40 · answer #6 · answered by Groovy 6 · 3 3

First attack on the towers - all perpetrators are in jail.

The rest of the question is incoherent so I can't speak to it.

2007-02-26 06:43:10 · answer #7 · answered by galinmcmahon 2 · 0 0

You say "it's time to do away with politics..." yet your question asks, "Why do liberals seek Americas [sic] downfall?"

You can't get more political than that -- politically rhetorical, in any case. Practice what you preach, please.

The simple answer to your rhetorical question is that they don't. Or you haven't proved that they do.

2007-02-26 05:35:36 · answer #8 · answered by Babu Chicorico 3 · 2 2

likely beause they do not support a mass murdering, torturing regime that went to war to gain oil, and is run by psychotic christian morons

2007-02-26 05:40:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

I see liberals as the new name for what was the communist party.

2007-02-26 05:43:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers