personally, i'm a wwe guy. I always have been and probably always will be because i grew up with it.But in my opinion the actual tna wrestling is a lot better than wwe and wwe is pure and simply all about storylines these days. I was just wondering what other wrestling fans think about it if your willing to answer my question :)
2007-02-26 04:54:25 · 15 answers · asked by silebyfc 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
WWF i thought back then it was way better u know when stone cold used to beat up the Rock
2007-02-26 04:58:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA is more focused on in ring action. Their booking is horrible though, and doesn't seem to make sense. They have amazing atheletes that they don't take advantage of and the in-ring psychology is horrible. Kevin Nash is pure comedic gold on the mic though.
WWE has always been about the entertainment side, and has never had any real good technical wrestlers (aside from the rare Bret Hart type wrestler) main event. Shawn Michaels is one of the best performers, The Rock had a limited moveset, Stone Cold had a limited moveset. They were the best at building up a feud and getting people interested in the storyline and that is why the WWE has been, and will be on top in the forseeable future.
2007-02-26 13:00:15 · answer #2 · answered by ubernoobnth 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA is good, but the WWE is what I grew up with, I had the hulk work out stuff the tapes the wrist bands and headband with the little weights. Now though I find myself watching TNA because of the action its non stop I dont worry about the storylines because they have good matches no matter what. Watching WWE is like watching repeats week in and week out, you know whats going to happen, you knew it would happen a month ago and its still being played out on your tv for what purpose.
2007-02-26 13:05:09 · answer #3 · answered by irishfan15202 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wwe is much better w/ controversy and fan base. Tna is so~so and only going to 2 or 3 different locations, as WWE goes to just about EVERY major city/arena
2007-02-26 13:09:08 · answer #4 · answered by out669cold 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think wwe is better then TNA but some of the wwe storylines are just lame.Then whole rey and chavo rival sucked because chavo is a crap superstar and rey went out of the title picture to early.Someday TNA will be much better then WWE if WWE comes up with these lame storylines
2007-02-26 13:36:24 · answer #5 · answered by timothy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as WWE and TNA are broadcast on different nights I'm going to watch both and not worry so much about which is better.
Its not like the WCW vs WWF days when you had to choose between watching Raw is War or Nitro.
2007-02-26 14:02:01 · answer #6 · answered by no more heroes 2001 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA has better wrestling matches, WWE has better characters
2007-02-27 17:43:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well......i lov wwe myself but.....im purfer TNA i mean its the best ....like thw Xdivition i mean who can match up with there talent.....wwe cruserweights r ok but thay have nothing on TNA plus u have wrestlers on wwe that r retiring getting old they need some new bloob up in there ya know but like TNA says i and i belive that thay r tha new face of pro wrestling.
2007-02-26 14:00:31 · answer #8 · answered by jerry s 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can't compare. One is major league-WWE, the other is below minor league-TNA.
2007-02-26 13:00:50 · answer #9 · answered by SiLKy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE because it has more experience.
2007-02-26 12:58:14 · answer #10 · answered by julie c~actress and WWE&TNA_FAN! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋