Bush is worser than Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Hussein, Noreaga, Castro, and all of the other dictators, Emperor Bush has made america look like a crueler version of nazi germany
2007-02-26 04:08:13 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I'm not exactly a big fan of Bush, but he's a boy scout compared to Hitler. I support intelligent criticism of our president, but comparing him to Hitler is not intelligent!
By comparing ANYTHING currently happening in the USA to the atrocities of Nazi Germany is to undermine the Hell of the concentrations camps, gas chambers and mass graves!
Even if Abu Ghraib was part of Bush's plan, the cruelty there paled in comparison to Auschwitz!
Stick to facts. By making such ridiculous comparisons, you lose an opportunity to share REAL, VALID complaints against Bush.
2007-02-26 16:03:44 · answer #1 · answered by Smart Kat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe you should ask yourself this...... Do we want to fight a war over there, or over here.... A very small taste of it was brought to us on 9/11. Your referring back to Hitler and Stalin, look at Hussien..... The only mistake made by Bush, was made by his father, when he didn't finish what he'd started with Desert Storm.... The real problem isn't just Bush, it's all the bleeding hearts here in the U.S. Do you honestly think if insurgents or muslim ragheads were here fighting, they'd be worried about women and children, they weren't on 9/11. What do we do...... we prosecute and jail our soliders if in the heat of battle they smoke a bystander... If I were Bush...... The first thing I would do is pull ALL of our troops out.... Then I carpet bomb Iraq, Iran and any of the other (&^%(% that wanted some of the action.....
2007-02-26 07:56:05 · answer #2 · answered by awftx 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The thing about Bush is, he found a way to sell vicious and pointless slaughter to mom and pop back home, just at a time when many thought we had progressed to a point where war would be an impossible sell to the average person. he did this with lies and the most corrupt administration since Grant, or at least since Harding. 9/11 made that possible for him. Without it, Vietnam era attitudes about war would have remained in place. This stirs suspicions that he was an insider to the 9/11 attacks, and said nothing. That's why the deer in the headlights look you see when they come into the classroom where he's reading my pet Goat to some of Congressman Foley's latest conquests, and told him the administration's secret plan was in motion. He isn't smooth or smart.
2007-02-26 04:41:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Are you an fool? we are living in a democracy. we've a representative form of government. The president, who occurs to be Bush at present, became into elected. two times, plenty to the chagrin of the Democratic social gathering who hate his guts. He can't run for re election returned. Presidents can in basic terms serve 2 words. a stable occasion of a bloody dictator may be the those days deposed Saddam Hussein who took administration of Iraq by utilising rigidity in the time of a coup wherein persons who opposed him have been thrown in reformatory or murdered. He then went directly to homicide hundreds of human beings, maximum extraordinarily the Kurds.
2016-10-02 00:42:05 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO. President Bush is an elected President there for by definition not a Dictator. As for the rest of your Anti-American rhetoric---You people have no problem lining up for hand outs from us when you cant feed your own people or if a countries attacks you guys call us first to save you. Well to bad for you. If you don't like how we do business then tell your government to stop taking $$$$$ from us. Stand on your own take care of yourselves for a change because we the tax payer of America are tired of taking care of you.
2007-02-26 04:19:30 · answer #5 · answered by Mother 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I do not know about the bloodiest or not . But for sure he is the -By Far the most full of BS I have ever hurd in my 58yrs of life.I can not name one thing he has said that was the Truth.
2007-02-26 10:55:12 · answer #6 · answered by leftlanepw@sbcglobal.net 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you need a history lesson...worst than Hitler pol pot Stalin .?.I am anti-Bush but not a fool !!!
2007-02-26 04:56:02 · answer #7 · answered by dadacoolone 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, maybe we should blame the insurgents that are not only killing our troops but also civilians. When will Libs quit putting all the deaths on the US. Why are you not angry at Iran for supplying arms,ammunition's and radicals for the bloodshed
2007-02-26 04:49:32 · answer #8 · answered by bereal1 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ahhhh....let's see.....NO!!!! You obviously have little knowledge of history if you think you can speak of any of those people in the same breath as Bush. Oh, that you could experience the conditions of living under any of those people first hand. Your nonsense is an insult to those who died and survived those demons! You even give the liberals a bad name!
2007-02-26 04:19:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Wow. You really don't know what your talking about do you.
Keep hitting the bong pinko.
And I am sure the labor boss mentality that the Clintons ruled with is kind and gentile.
2007-02-26 07:59:49 · answer #10 · answered by John S 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋