Global Warming is a myth.
This planet will continue to exist long after we are all dead and fossilized.
Now, what we should be doing is learning to conserve. If you would like to discuss ideas on this topic, let me know.
2007-02-26 03:36:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by kja63 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, I agree that Global Warming is an issue, no matter how it is caused (either natural, man made, or a combination). But nobody says the planet wont make it past the end of the century. I couple degree average increase worldwide does not mean that all life will perish. It just changes thing, such as low lying areas might be flooded, different growing seasons, etc. I hope we can stop it, but at the same time, dont be too alarmist over it either.
2007-02-26 03:40:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by bmwdriver11 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
We all contribute in different ways and so it has to begin at home. Our planet will survive the global warming by disposing of the problem. Human action caused a natural re-action from mother nature.
The Earth doesn't need humans to survive where as humans are strictly dependent.
I don't think global warming will make human life extinct, just a little smaller in population. The survivors of a different world and a new start.
2007-03-05 05:00:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by ringolarry 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Two kinds of people:
1) The ones who think global warming is a myth.
2) The ones who think global warming is real, but don't think we can do anything to stop or slow it.
The first group of people ignore the fact that there is a consensus within the scientific community that global warming is real, and that humans are adding to the problem. They bring their own 'scientists' to the debate, and attempt to disprove or discredit anyone who dares disagree with them.
The second group have just adopted a nihlistic mindset, and it might be possible to convince some of them otherwise.
The facts are: The earth is heating up, which could have disasterous results for anyone living on it. Humans are contributing to the problem. Humans are capable of doing something about it, and through innovation, may very well be able to signifigantly slow or completely eliminate the problem.
Anyone who tells you otherwise is selling something (usually ignorance).
2007-02-26 03:44:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by joemammysbigguns 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Reduce JET traffic. CO2 produced on the surface of the earth is instantly absorbed by plants and the oceans. Fuel that is burned above 30,000 ft has no natural mechanism to be cleared rapidly. A JET engine burns 1-5 tons of fuel per hour. Burning 1 ton of fuel produces 3.66 tons of CO2 and 1.56 tons of water. There are thousands of hours of JET traffic each day over the earth. The normal gradient for CO2 is down as it is heavier than air and the earths surface absorbs it instantly. Particularly the oceans. It has a buffer system that is limitless in its reservoir for absorbing CO2. It holds the CO2 until the plants can take it up.
2007-03-05 16:03:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
People who live in cold places, or people with property inland that want ocean front real estate. Our planet will last many thousands of centuries, with or without global warming
2007-02-26 03:39:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well the answer to that question is you. At this moment you are using a computer that, while being manufactured, released all kinds of noxious chemical into the atmosphere, not to mention the future hazardous waste it'll create when you discarded it and it is sent to some third world nation to be dismantled in an unrestricted manner to extract what little precious metal is in the circuitry. You are sitting in a plastic computer chair you bought, wearing your polymer running shoes, with which you will walk across your polyester carpet, past your running refrigerator, up to your light switch to turn off your electric light powered by a coal burning electicity plant, out of your wood framed house, insulated with fiberglass to keep your heat in the house during winter and your air conditioning in during the summer, on your way out to your late model fossil fuel burning car, to take an unneccessary drive up to the store to buy a gallon of milk that was pumped from the utter of one of hundreds of thousands of dairy cows, which emit huge amounts of methane gas, while listening to your plastic cased, circuitry packed Ipod instead of your radio because Al Franken left Air America and it isn't as much fun listening to anyone else besides Al rag on those idiot Americans who are addicted to foriegn oil and are the morons who are causing the world to overheat through their self-centeredness and mindless attachment to having the worlds highest standard of living. Have a nice drive home! By the way, you forgot to turn off your computer when you left.
2007-02-26 04:41:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by schlum l 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Satan and his dominions. Get it nice and hot. I don't want to contribute but when I tried to ride my horse to work I got a lot of flack from other commuters and I got arrested for unauthorized freeway use (my horse is still impounded). I tried to not use petrol and my food was cold, my family was cold, and I kept running into things in the dark. Most don't want to contribute but that is the way things are. You think God might have forseen this?
2007-02-26 10:00:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by mohayrix 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
that is genuine! And the worst area is, they constantly seem to have scientists, or perhaps technology itself, on their area. that could appear like a bad element for conservatives, in view that technology is basically the heavily controlled, independent commentary and documentation of certainty, yet as a minimum of one consumer has stated on right here for a while, certainty does have slightly a liberal bias ;) (standard protip for everybody everywhere in politics: in case you come across that your political place calls so you might make an enemy out of technology, your place might earnings from a sprint adjustment.)
2016-09-29 22:38:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by lichtenberger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Greedy people! I Have many ideas of putting a end or slowing down greenhouse effect. The only problem is the us wood never accept them,we are too free,like a bunch of wild animals out of control!
2007-02-26 03:39:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋