H.R. 1022 - Who else is tired of liberal democrats usurping the Constitution they swore to uphold?

Question

A bill to reinstate the "Assault Weapons Ban" that was voted to fade into obscurity in 2004, after 10 years of Nazi-esque measures to ban certain features that liberal democrats deemed "unnecessary" and "evil"...this is a waste of taxpayer's dollars!

Please share your opinions.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-1022

By the numbers...

Argle - The 2nd Amendment makes it possible for us to enjoy and protect all the others. You should hold it dear as well.

hichef - You think additional laws are going to make criminals care about safeguarding their weapons? Like it or not, criminals have children they do not care about. The law-abiding gun owners by in large aren't the ones leaving weapons behind with which kids harm themselves & others. These laws harm the law abiding gun owner who WILL abide the law, to criminals, it's another law to disrespect. Speaking of responsibility, where did Alan Hevesi of NY take responsibility for his comments? If it would've been anyone else, they would be in a padded cell in Leavenworth.
jamustri - show me ONE U.S. Citizen being held in camp GITMO...and I'm sorry you don't think you should own your coveted H&K rifle, but who is anyone to decide I can't if I wanted one?
WMD - Quit smokin' that crap for a second & get on the same page...we're not talkin bout SMGs

hyperion - Again, trying to disarm those who are neither motivated nor inclined to 'outgun' police officers isn't going to get criminals to lay down their illegally acquired arms. You should be concerned with those who don't care about the laws. Who are you to decide what I need and not need? Does anyone NEED to drive a Porsche? Will you back legislation to ban them simply because they go fast, and 'speed kills?' Will you back legislation to ban stoves and sources of flame, as man might burn himself, the same with water as man may drown in it?

Answer 1

The purpose of the 2nd Amendment was to give people the power to overthrow a dictatorial government. It is beyond me as to why Democrats who so hate the Bush Administration so much would work so hard to make sure The People cannot get out from under him. If they had any sense at all (or were honest about their motives) they would be working to gurantee that EVERY citizen MUST own at least one firearm, and carry it at all times.

Answer 2

particular he has. He has violated Article II section 4 collectively as he bribed congressmen that grew to grow to be into no longer in desire of this bill. He has additionally violated substitute 10 of the Consitution which states, "The powers of the u . s . by technique of the type, nor prohibited by technique of it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the human beings." the form is the regulation of the land and not something over rides it era end of tale. What the type says stands. because of fact of this circumstances ought to desire to bypass to the spectacular court docket so the court docket can throw them out as unconstitutional.

Answer 3

The typical family in Iraq owns at least 1 AK-47. Hooray!

Answer 4

Seriously man, no one in the right wing has any right to even mention constitutional erosion. The do I need to remind the unpatriotic act? Stealing people out of their homes in the middle of the night not charging them with a crime and shipping them off to a foreign land to be tortured until they admit to an imaginary one..the list goes on and on.
And in regards to your question, I have been a member of the NRA since I was 7 and as much as I would love to have a heckler and Koch g3a3 NATO assault rifle I really don't think I should.

Answer 5

I am tired of BOTH Democrats and Republicans raping and pissing on the US Constitution.

Dems trying to get rid of weapons and Republicans making themselves immune to law and stripping away freedom.

They are both nothing more than puking cowards who deserve a horrible and painful fate

Answer 6

Why do you need assault weapons?To hunt with?I haven't seen any deer wearing body armor lately.How do you justify making weapons that most police officers would rather not be on the streets available to any and all?

I would rather not have the police out gunned,so I support any such measure.

Answer 7

LOL, that's too funny. Even during the last "Assault Weapons Ban" I bought about five assault weapons and one was a fully automatic weapon. They can cry and stomp their feet all they want but they are only hurting the honest citizens. Not that I'm dishonest but I wanted to prove their failed laws are just as reticules as I thought it was and you know, I was right.

I say piss on their failed laws!

Answer 8

Don't you find it humorous that the same people who get downright weepy in their defense of every last comma and jot in the First Amendment apparently feel the Founding Fathers were simply kidding when they penned the Second?

Answer 9

just like drugs, there is no redeeming beneifts to SOME aspects of weaponry, and these represent them. Now, if you want to attach some personal responsibility to 'accidental' shootings, I may change my mind. But as long as someone can blame theft on the fact that they lost track of their gun, or let children go to prison for adult crimes when they are 7 years old...instead of charging the person who bought the gun, or allowed a child access to it, then the government has to step in and play daddy. I don't like it, but I don't like it when some person just decides to kill several people at once and i have to pay his court costs and appeals either.

Answer 10

Dems love terrorists.