I think Hillary could win, but I honestly don't trust, and I think alot of people feel this way. I like Obama alot, but I wonder if he can get elected. Democrats will have the edge this election, but you can't just bank on any democrat being elected. There are still alot of prejudice people in America that I think may vote against Obama because of the color of his skin and that his Dad was a muslim.
Al Gore is the most liberal of the Democrats with clout (which can work against you), but he really has picked up alot of support from his work on global warming. He also has the experience we need in foreign affairs as well. I always thought of him as a stiff like Kerry, but I honestly think he has changed. I also really don't think he wants to run again.
I know that if he ran - I would vote for him. I would even get off my butt and campaign for him (never done that before).
2007-02-26 02:24:29 · 11 answers · asked by bjmarchini 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Gore? No way. He can't even take his home state, much less any state in the south or midwest. And his global warming push is half truths, since global warming is really natural climate change and not man made.
Gore is a has been and can't do it. Hillary is a crook and can't do it. Obama is inexperienced and related to a muslim, so he sure the heck can't do it.
Giuliani as a moderate Republican will take the '08 presidency.
2007-02-26 02:37:48 · answer #1 · answered by redjetta 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I am not so sure we have the edge as you say. We have a huge majority in voters but we love to run off huge voting blocks, like southerners, religious people, families, labor, etc. This time we will run Obama and tell every white person that they will be racist if they don't vote for him and they won't because they aren't. Obama might be putting his name out there for exposure for the future, as he is a one term elected official and lacks a little bit of experience. Since his primary qualification is going to be race, we will alienate huge blocks of voters and he will lose. Hillary is a trainwreck and could get McCain elected. Gore is absurd and you mention his position on global warming but his position is that when he had a chance to do something, VP in a Dem Administration with a Dem Majority on Congress and he let the Kyoto Accords go unsigned. He had the whole football and fumbled it so lets give it back to him??? Naw, if you are buying him as an environmentalist I don't think he is stands up to W on that issue. We need someone but you are already closed minded and two thirds of your candidate have already been rejected nationally. Gore and Hillary helped elect Bush, maybe THEY are Republican undercover candidates. Hooah!
2007-02-26 03:50:35 · answer #2 · answered by Tom W 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
while you're working a marketing campaign waged on techniques and liberal spirit, then according to danger you're directly to something. while you are attempting to win a presidential marketing campaign to realize 270 electoral votes in this u . s . a ., you will could renowned that having 2 unabashed liberals on the value ticket will harm your nominees' possibilities. bear in suggestions that the only 2 Democrats to win interior the final 35 years have been Jimmy Carter and invoice Clinton. Neither individual replace into seen by skill of the democratic base as being overly liberal. Clinton, in basic terms before being president, replace right into a greatest determine in attempting to make certain that conservative democratic concepts have been being adhered to. It replace into him, particularly than George W. Bush who later stated that "the era of vast government is over." So, i think of your value ticket is an enticing one and would easily generate solid interest between the 30-35% who evaluate themselves to be on the left and would vote Democratic no remember what. In all honesty, thinking the not basic side in his video clips, and with little journey, it is confusing to work out how Moore woulld make the mandatory concerted charm to self sustaining voters to strengthen the Democratic base, assuming, of direction, victory replace into your desirable objective.
2016-10-16 12:49:23 · answer #3 · answered by shakita 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gore needed a black vice- president back then not a Jew. But Clinton nailed the Jew in the ticket. It was the outcome of Monica Lewinsky deal.
2007-02-26 03:13:18 · answer #4 · answered by DAVAY 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.obamatruth.org/
Wouldn't vote for Al Gore, Hillary or Barack Hussein Obama.
2007-02-26 02:36:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yea, let Gore run and suffer another humiliating defeat. He deserves to grovel some more.
2007-02-26 02:38:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Good for you about campaigning for him.
I don't care who you support as long as you're willing to do more than just sit on Yahoo Answers and slag off other people for their viewpoints.
I wish he'd run to as I think that he would again win the popular vote. Let's just hope the Supreme Court stays out of this election.
2007-02-26 02:29:18 · answer #7 · answered by Blitzhund 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I pray to God he doesn't try to run.
I would like to see Giuliani or McCain someone who could truly handle the Presidency.
2007-03-01 17:00:56 · answer #8 · answered by Chosen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's said many times that he won't be running... that he's more committed to lobbying and spreading the word about Global Warming now.
It's a shame, I think he could've had a better chance this time around. I would've voted for him.
2007-02-26 02:33:00 · answer #9 · answered by Winette 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
HOPE - no.
There is no HOPE for Al Gore.
2007-02-26 02:28:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋