English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

most of the scientist have accept the big bang theory, but did they identify yet where it was happen? in or near about our galaxy? is it possible to identify?

2007-02-26 01:28:47 · 18 answers · asked by Difi 4 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

To GM, u r looking too much......... . i think u r missguided trained from bible.

but to Psichore, thx very much for ur valuable opinion.

2007-02-26 01:55:04 · update #1

18 answers

Lets ponder a bit on what the Big Bang Theory is:

The Big bang Hypothesis:
The Big Bang is a hypothesis based on the fact that the universe is expanding. The conjecture is that at the beginning of time, all the matter and energy of then universe were packed into a tiny space, in fact into a singularity with INFINITE density.

There was nothing (matter or energy) around that singularity, but you can always construct mathematical space of infinite extent around any point as well as around the Big Bang singularity. The difference is that that mathematical space is not space-time i.e. something physical. It would be just a mental construct.



Expansion after Big Bang:
Hubble discovered that each and every galaxy is moving away from each other in every direction. It is like a number of dots on a balloon, which when inflated move away from each other. It is expansion of each dot from the other in all direction on the surface of the balloon.

Now, just after Big Bang, the space-time that we live in just appeared (like a magic), but of course, due to extreme density of mass-energy , it was highly curved (according to the Einstein's general theory of gravitation). then it started expansion era, of different kind, like inflation, normal expansion, etc. and all the matter/energy particles moved away from each other. This is still happening but at a much slower rate.


It is better to conceptualize it as something very dense. Physical particles and energies, everything around us was very close by, making the density infinite. Just imagine yourself squeezed by everything around you. You will get some idea of the extreme density.

Of course, as I said, you can imagine mathematical space around it but it will not be physical. An analogy may be infinite universes within each point. You can do that mathematically by scaling, but that is not physical as we do not see the effects of matter of that universe on us.

"most of the scientist have accept the big bang theory, but did they identify yet where it was happen? in or near about our galaxy? is it possible to identify?"

The answer to your question is that it happened everywhere. The space that we live in just popped up from nothing all at once. In that sense it is a kind of Bang but remember that there was no sound in the usual sense. Of course the bang itself had to be rather violent.


The key point to remember is that, in physics space-time is not just a mathematical space. It has very dynamical physical existence governed by a very well understood set of physical laws.

2007-02-26 16:58:17 · answer #1 · answered by Dalilur R 3 · 0 0

There is a small problem in identifying a location for the big bang. Well, two really.

The first is that space and time originated in some sense in the big bang. The big bang is a singularity - a point in which space and time is curved asymptotically to a point. However, this on its own would not lead to not being able to identifying a otional point - ie a centre to the universe (assuming a symmetric explosion at the big bang).

The second problem is that the big bang alone is not sufficient to describe the universe as we see it. As the early universe cooled (in the first few moments of its existence) it must have gone through a period of very rapid expansion, in which spacetime itself was flowing out rapidly. This period is know as inflation, but is not at all well understood. Inflation really precludes identifying a point in the universe as is now that is where it all began.

2007-02-26 02:59:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

theory is pure speculation .If these people really knew there would be no speculation .There is so no one knows .To quote times of years .and places is so out blandish. Of things that are to far away to be seen. Beyond comprehension that are and never will disclose. Or discover were the Universe ends and started is totally Impossible. .We will never know if we live has long has the Universe itself .Still I suppose while they are blinding some with science .they are blinding no one else.I have heard dont ask the question what was before the Big bang .But they are happy to quote what happened just prior before it.Say no more BBBBAANNGGG there goes an other LoL

2007-02-26 09:53:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The site of the origin of the big bang is not visible to us, being as it is too far away in space, and therefore we cannot identify exactly where it happened.

Some people claim that the big bang is everywhere, but that seems to be a best guess that will not stand up to scrutiny.

2007-02-26 04:01:34 · answer #4 · answered by Fred 7 · 0 0

big bang sure happened at a point..a point which is not the usual sense of the word...it started where space and time somehow 'converged' to a pointt so that then there was no space or time in the everyday sense of the word...confused?..i dont blame u...all u need to understand is there is much more to the concept of space and time than we have taken for granted ...just like an infinitely elastic rubber sheet,the space time 'fabric' around us can curl and uncurl,twist and streach and even break..its within this fabric that we move about and type and jump.imagine a condition when the rubber sheet of space time has shrunk to a point...this was the condition when big bang happened...since the big bang the sheet has been expanding...but it sure is distorted and even broken at places...bizzare huh?

2007-02-26 02:21:33 · answer #5 · answered by poornima l 1 · 0 0

One of the biggest misconceptions about the big bang model is that it is like an ordinary explosion. it is not. The expansion of the universe is not a matter of things flying through space from a big explosion. Instead, it is space itself that is expanding. And this expansion of space happens everywhere. So, every single place in the universe is where the big bang happened (and continues to happen, by the way).

All this may seem very strange, but it is how the mathematics of general relativity works out. Remember that gravity is described by a distortion of the geometry of space and time. In the same way, the universe as a whole is described by an overall geometry where the spatial part is expanding over time.

As to when it happened: our best estimate is about 13.7 billion years ago.

2007-02-26 01:33:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

the big bang is a myth as far as it applies to starting the universe.this can be

proven by galixy collisions. galixy collisions require two different points of origin

and a big bang has only one point of originwhere all matter goes outward from a

single point the time line required for a galixy to do a 180 degree turn and the

intense gravitational forces needed for this exceade the 13.8 billion year life of

the universe as thought of by big bangers. This event would take billions of

billions of light years to compleate.but if the universe was eternal and cosmic

explosions occured all over it at various times then galixy collisions can occur

often and in many different places simultainiuosly.

2007-02-26 04:09:21 · answer #7 · answered by Tony N 3 · 0 0

The point of the big bang was actually a time vector,a spacial singularity existed with it,it was not really a place.
The place came with second and third pulse,by this time it was well on it's way.
Go back to a point about 10 to minus 95 second from zero all the action began at this point.

2007-02-26 02:47:36 · answer #8 · answered by Billy Butthead 7 · 0 0

enormous Bang relies on the concept that one and all count is contained in a finite quantity of area; consequently, all gravity pulls inward, warping 4D area-time to such an quantity that one and all rapidly traces intersect themselves. The finite universe concept have been given a foothold till now we stumbled on that area is increasing, and curiously increasing at an accelerating p.c... enormous Bang comes from extrapolating the enlargement backward in time till the quantity of the universe became into supposedly 0. this is ludicrous to presume we are in a position to work out that some distance returned while there is plenty we don't be responsive to with regard to the modern. We nonetheless don't be responsive to the reason for gravity; the warping of area-time is a mathematical description of the consequence, no longer the reason. we don't understand the mechanics of galaxy rotation. we don't also have a stable definition of what area is. So how can it make sense to coach the clock returned to 10^-40 two 2nd after the alleged enormous Bang? Now, there are a number of available theories based on the concept that area and time are limitless. If there are equivalent quantities of mass at limitless distance in each and every path, then there is not any great-scale warping of area-time, and rapidly traces proceed infinitely without intersecting. working the clock backward could advise a beginning up while count became into infinitely dense, even though it may nonetheless be limitless in quantity---no longer a singularity. If the universe is finite, it could sometime be achieveable to coach that. it could in no way be achieveable to coach that the universe if limitless. the two finite and limitless universe theories will persist till shown incorrect. till then, all cosmological innovations, consisting of massive Bang, could desire to be seen as philosophy and faith. the indisputable fact that government funds are available in basic terms to scientists who settle for enormous Bang quantities to an employer of religion. this is a contravention of the 5th replace of the U.S. shape.

2016-10-02 00:28:55 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Are concentrated to our return. The consisting universe finite in its dimension and the infinite in its time and of the Sun (nucleus), planets (electrons), and the Interestrelar System (sphericity-peripheral of the Universe) that they will count different “nebulas” I contend a great one I number of electron-stars. As Diagram of Tarcísio Brito. How much the Way Láctea, galaxy, quasares, Big Bang and other mirages. They are always intent in the billions of stars that say to be Sun, in the nebulas that say to be galaxies if finding; nothing more they are that astronomical speculations that still confuse “garlic” with “bugalhos”


We are the only Earthlings in the whole universe. The old peoples had tried with tenacity to understand the Universe, but they not yet had developed the conscience of Tarcísio Brito: Great Atom Universe, is divided in three energies: electrons, prótons and nêutrons. To electrons the negative power, but, with positive return. To prótons, the positive power, but, with negative return. With regard to nêutrons, the responsibility sobrou to act, of form to unbalance the positive and negative forces in its related limits. Thus it neutralizes the beginning and end. Energies that come of the place for where go, and go for the place of where they come.

2007-02-26 01:38:30 · answer #10 · answered by britotarcisio 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers