English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or does he only know that it will be four degrees warmer a hundred years from now? Shouldn't we be more concerned about thousand-degree temperature changes? Aren't Iranian nukes bad for the environment?

2007-02-26 01:18:21 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

Maybe Gore *is* wrong. Maybe global warming isn't the result of carbon dioxide emmissions but rather all the hot air spewing from right wing blowhards like yourself.

2007-02-26 01:24:53 · answer #1 · answered by CelticPixie 4 · 5 1

What's the matter, didn't get enough of a reaction when you posted this same stupid question a couple of minutes ago?

2007-02-26 09:22:34 · answer #2 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 2 1

Do I detect sour grapes on your part, because he has an Oscar now and you don't?

2007-02-26 09:34:06 · answer #3 · answered by tangerine 7 · 0 0

Ha ! Yes he should but he is more worried about his band wagon and where it is going. Not the here and now.

2007-02-26 09:22:39 · answer #4 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 1 2

You skipped every single one of those science and math classes, didn’t you?

2007-02-26 09:22:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

He could check the internet; after all he created it.

2007-02-26 09:28:14 · answer #6 · answered by Rich F 3 · 2 2

we'll see what you say in july (p.s. it's obvious you're only talking our of your, well, you know)

2007-02-26 09:30:01 · answer #7 · answered by izaboe 5 · 1 0

Gore is right (again), you are wrong (again). Get over it, loser.

2007-02-26 09:37:00 · answer #8 · answered by Count Acumen 5 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers