2007-02-26 01:13:43 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
Unknown. It is also an assumption that he did. Nothing has indicated that it was Mcann (9th) to Eccelestobe (10th), it wasn't featured on TV and none of the new adventure novels have dealt with it. The Nth Doctor (as featured in the BBC book and webcast), may well be postioned between them.
2007-02-26 01:17:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
That particular re-generation was neither shown, nor explained. The new series of Doctor Who with the wonderfully quirky and skilled acting of Christopher Eccleston simply started with the Doctor appearing from nowhere, as usual, and rapidly getting involved in a threat to the safety of Earth.
I personally thought it worked well: Doctor Who had been missing from our screens for many years and it was unnecessary for a detailed explanation of a replacement Doctor. I think after seeing every change of doctor from my own personal favourite (William Hartnell) onwards, we all got the picture!
2007-02-26 09:19:45 · answer #2 · answered by Raymo 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Paul mcgann was a special, mini millennium thing
2007-02-26 09:17:12 · answer #3 · answered by steven m 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Rumour has it there will be radio plays or similar to explain this one at a later date.
2007-02-26 09:48:32 · answer #4 · answered by captainreilly83 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We never actually get told, but I would like to think it has to do with the time war.
2007-02-26 12:25:07 · answer #5 · answered by Berni 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋