If a major US City gets nuked by terrorists, will that help or hurt "Global Warming"?

Question

I would think it would make the Earth hotter and contribute to the "Warming Trend", but I bet the Liberals think it would actually be a good thing. Less Americans to eat the beef and drive the cars.

Answer 1

The best post I've seen on here in awhile said something like this:

Global warming = fear that the global temp will rise over a century
Global terrorism= fear that the global temp will rise in a few minutes

Obviously refering to the terrorists trying to ultimately nuke the west.

Al Gore is fooling some of the people all of the time with his global warming scare campaign.

Answer 2

hm.. which you would be able to nuke a city.. it might could be a suitcase nuke. in basic terms countries that have that kind of technologies are the U. S., Britain, China, Russia and a handful of different friendly eu countries. Al Qaida can prefer and prefer all day long.. it is not gonna take place. yet.. assuming it did.. i'd pass after the actual terrorists.. like we did superb after 9/11.. and that i does not replace into "not very thinking them" as Bush did with Bin Ladin and that i does not invade a midsection jap u . s . a . that had not something to do with the bombings alongside the way. i'd additionally in all probability advance the point of particular opps forces and use them extra advantageous than the vast huge sword of an invasion tension this is the U. S. military.. don't get me incorrect.. our military kicks some significant a*s.. yet they are actually not geared up to combat terrorism. The stat they tell West ingredient grads is that for the period of a conflict royal the U. S. defense force ought to take the subsequent 3 properly suited powers on.. and that i've got confidence that.. yet they are actually not made to combat the conflict we've asked them to combat.. and thank God for that.. for they might could be miraculous oppressive and heartless to be effective.. i'm happy we've extra humanity than that right here interior the U. S.. additionally.. i wouldn't in basic terms use the militia and particular forces.. i'd launch a huge propaganda marketing campaign and training marketing campaign against terrorism.. for interior the tip.. this is the only actual treatment. so .. do I certainly have your vote?

Answer 3

Does that mean that the 2 nuks that u droped over Japan ,hurted Global warming???
or does it mean that the war that u started in Iraq & Afganistan & the tons of bombs that u dropped over the innocent civ did hurt the global warming???
or maybe the 1000s of nuck experiments u did ,did hurt the global warming???
Look at what u did first, and u'll find the real reason behind global warming.

Answer 4

Wrong.

It's called a Nuclear Winter. The amount of ash and dust kicked into the atmosphere would cause greater cloud cover and decrease overall global temps.

It's much the same as the effect from a volcanic eruption.

A single 10 megaton nuclear detonation would likely have around the same effects as the Mt. St Helens eruption in 1980 and lower global temps around 2-3c for a year or two. Any larger could plunge the northern hemisphere into a prolonged cold snap such as was caused by the Vesuvius eruption of 70ad.

Not sure why I've got 4 thumbs down on this as its factually correct - please see the following article for reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_winter

Answer 5

Won't do much of anything, other than make the city a lousy place to live for a while.

Answer 6

who will think of global warming when you are in a war? just think.

Answer 7

It wouldn't do anything back in the 1950's and 1960's they exploded so many Nuclear bombs above ground and the weather didn't change to my knowledge

Answer 8

well most certainly it will help global warming along in that area and any where the uppers winds carry the irradiated air to.