Only if the Dems underfund them and quit supporting our troops
If Clinton would have taken the initiative to take Osama out
(10 chances) - we would not have been in this mess
but he gutted the CIA - and put up blocks to prevent the FBI from sharing info with the CIA
thanks Bill - we remember
2007-02-26 00:25:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by tom4bucs 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Mismanaged yes. Wrong intentions yes. I cannot soundly say it is failed yet unless we leave Iraq for the insurgents. 10 years from now if they become a democratic powerful nation it will spread to others and peace more then likely will follow. I do not think the true outcome will show for some years. It is the heartland theory. Good article..
2007-02-26 00:31:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by cyborg_2099 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
we would be in this conflict for an extremely long term, and sorry, yet a Dem will no longer be president for an prolonged time. Hillary is already stumbling over her turn flops, and it extremely is sparkling she's no longer the savvy flesh presser her husband grow to be. till now she hangs herself she'll mutilate Obama, so i does no longer hardship approximately him the two. apart from, Dems are by no potential going to even nominate a black guy to run for president. Get a clue.
2016-11-25 23:58:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The war is nothing compared to the inflation that is sure to follow. It will be interesting to find out who gets blamed for that. Inflation always follows war, and we no longer have Greenspan to help us.
2007-02-26 02:04:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Paul K 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
2007-02-26 00:24:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mario Savio 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am not sure but my guess is yes but then again I may be wrong.
2007-02-26 00:27:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
One party state anyone??
2007-02-26 00:34:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by hobo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It now looks that way.
2007-02-26 00:27:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by DEMMY 3
·
0⤊
0⤋